Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35715444›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Applying convolutional neural networks to speed up environmental DNA annotation in a highly diverse ecosystem.

Benjamin Flück, Laëtitia Mathon, Stéphanie Manel, Alice Valentini, Tony Dejean, Camille Albouy, David Mouillot, Wilfried Thuiller, Jérôme Murienne, Sébastien Brosse and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Benjamin FlückDepartment of Environmental System Science, ETH Zürich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland. benjamin.flueck@usys.ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-0396-6383
Laëtitia MathonCEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8147-8177
Stéphanie ManelCEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8902-6052
Alice ValentiniSPYGEN, Le Bourget-du-Lac, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5829-5479
Tony DejeanSPYGEN, Le Bourget-du-Lac, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5115-4902
Camille AlbouyDECOD (Ecosystem Dynamics and Sustainability), IFREMER, INRAE, Institut Agro - Agrocampus Ouest, Rue de l'Ile d'Yeu, BP21105, 44311, Nantes Cedex 3, France.
David MouillotMARBEC, Univ. Montpellier,CNRS, IRD, Ifremer, Montpellier, France.
Wilfried ThuillerCNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5388-5274
Jérôme MurienneLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (UMR5174), CNRS, IRD, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1474-7829
Sébastien BrosseLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (UMR5174), CNRS, IRD, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3659-8177
Loïc PellissierDepartment of Environmental System Science, ETH Zürich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland. loic.pellissier@usys.ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-2289-8259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput DNA sequencing is becoming an increasingly important tool to monitor and better understand biodiversity responses to environmental changes in a standardized and reproducible way. Environmental DNA (eDNA) from organisms can be captured in ecosystem samples and sequenced using metabarcoding, but processing large volumes of eDNA data and annotating sequences to recognized taxa remains computationally expensive. Speed and accuracy are two major bottlenecks in this critical step. Here, we evaluated the ability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to process short eDNA sequences and associate them with taxonomic labels. Using a unique eDNA data set collected in highly diverse Tropical South America, we compared the speed and accuracy of CNNs with that of a well-known bioinformatic pipeline (OBITools) in processing a small region (60 bp) of the 12S ribosomal DNA targeting freshwater fishes. We found that the taxonomic labels from the CNNs were comparable to those from OBITools, with high correlation levels for the composition of the regional fish fauna. The CNNs enabled the processing of raw fastq files at a rate of approximately 1 million sequences per minute, which was about 150 times faster than with OBITools. Given the good performance of CNNs in the highly diverse ecosystem considered here, the development of more elaborate CNNs promises fast deployment for future biodiversity inventories using eDNA.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalEcosystemAnimalsBiodiversityDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEnvironmental MonitoringFishesNeural Networks, ComputerDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID35715444
PMCPMC9205931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.