Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35715352›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Vaccines based on the replication-deficient simian adenoviral vector ChAdOx1: Standardized template with key considerations for a risk/benefit assessment.

Pedro M Folegatti, Daniel Jenkin, Susan Morris, Sarah Gilbert, Denny Kim, James S Robertson, Emily R Smith, Emalee Martin, Marc Gurwith, Robert T Chen and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The seroprevalence of adenoviruses since 2000Emerging microbes & infections · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The systemic capillary leak syndrome following COVID-19 vaccine.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro M FolegattiUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Daniel JenkinUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Susan MorrisUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sarah GilbertUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Denny KimBrighton Collaboration, a program of the Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, USA.
James S RobertsonBrighton Collaboration, a program of the Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, USA.
Emily R SmithBrighton Collaboration, a program of the Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, USA. Electronic address: bc-coordinator@taskforce.org.
Emalee MartinBrighton Collaboration, a program of the Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, USA.
Marc GurwithBrighton Collaboration, a program of the Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, USA.
Robert T ChenBrighton Collaboration, a program of the Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, USA.
Benefit-Risk Assessment of VAccines by TechnolOgy Working Group BRAVATO, ex-V3SWG)
The Task Force for Global Health · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replication-deficient adenoviral vectors have been under investigation as a platform technology for vaccine development for several years and have recently been successfully deployed as an effective COVID-19 counter measure. A replication-deficient adenoviral vector based on the simian adenovirus type Y25 and named ChAdOx1 has been evaluated in several clinical trials since 2012. The Brighton Collaboration Benefit-Risk Assessment of VAccines by TechnolOgy (BRAVATO) was formed to evaluate the safety and other key features of new platform technology vaccines. This manuscript reviews key features of the ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines. The simian adenovirus Y25 was chosen as a strategy to circumvent pre-existing immunity to common human adenovirus serotypes which could impair immune responses induced by adenoviral vectored vaccines. Deletion of the E1 gene renders the ChAdOx1 vector replication incompetent and further genetic engineering of the E3 and E4 genes allows for increased insertional capability and optimizes vaccine manufacturing processes. ChAdOx1 vectored vaccines can be manufactured in E1 complementing cell lines at scale and are thermostable. The first ChAdOx1 vectored vaccines approved for human use, against SARS-CoV-2, received emergency use authorization in the UK on 30th December 2020, and is now approved in more than 180 countries. Safety data were compiled from phase I-III clinical trials of ChAdOx1 vectored vaccines expressing different antigens (influenza, tuberculosis, malaria, meningococcal B, prostate cancer, MERS-CoV, Chikungunya, Zika and SARS-CoV-2), conducted by the University of Oxford, as well as post marketing surveillance data for the COVID-19 Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. Overall, ChAdOx1 vectored vaccines have been well tolerated. Very rarely, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), capillary leak syndrome (CLS), immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) have been reported following mass administration of the COVID-19 Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. The benefits of this COVID-19 vaccination have outweighed the risks of serious adverse events in most settings, especially with mitigation of risks when possible. Extensive immunogenicity clinical evaluation of ChAdOx1 vectored vaccines reveal strong, durable humoral and cellular immune responses to date; studies to refine the COVID-19 protection (e.g., via homologous/heterologous booster, fractional dose) are also underway. New prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines based on the ChAdOx1 vector are currently undergoing pre-clinical and clinical assessment, including vaccines against viral hemorrhagic fevers, Nipah virus, HIV, Hepatitis B, amongst others.

Indexed as

Adenoviruses, SimianCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesZika VirusZika Virus InfectionHumansMaleRisk AssessmentSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesAdenovirusBenefit/RiskSafetyVaccineVirus

Identifiers

PMID35715352
PMCPMC9194875
OpenAlexW4282928550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.