Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35715291›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia2022

High-Dose versus Low-Dose Corticosteroids in COVID-19 Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Rachel Si Jing Tan, Ka Ting Ng, Chua Ee Xin, Rafidah Atan, Nor'azim Mohd Yunos, M Shahnaz Hasan

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel Si Jing TanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ka Ting NgDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: katingng1@um.edu.my.
Chua Ee XinQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
Rafidah AtanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Nor'azim Mohd YunosDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
M Shahnaz HasanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
University of Malaya · MYQueen Elizabeth Hospital · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe clinical efficacy of corticosteroids remains unclear. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the use of high-dose versus low- dose corticosteroids on the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

settingElectronic search for randomized controlled trials and observational studies (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL).

participantsHospitalized adults ≥ 18 years old who were SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive.

interventionsHigh-dose and low-dose corticosteroids. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsA total of twelve studies (n=2759 patients) were included in this review. The pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference in mortality rate between the high-dose and low-dose corticosteroids groups (n=2632; OR: 1.07 [95%CI 0.67, 1.72], p=0.77, I

conclusionThe meta-analysis demonstrated high-dose corticosteroids did not reduce mortality rate. However, high-dose corticosteroids did not pose higher risk of hyperglycemia and infection rate for COVID-19 patients. Due to the inconclusive trial sequential analysis, substantial heterogeneity and low level of evidence, future large-scale randomized clinical trials are warranted to improve the certainty of evidence for the use of high-dose compared to low-dose corticosteroids in COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19HyperglycemiaAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultHumansRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2Adrenal Cortex HormonesCoronavirusCorticosteroidsCOVID-19DexamethasoneMethylprednisoloneSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35715291
PMCPMC9101704
OpenAlexW4280581226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.