ArticleeNeuro
Optoception: Perception of Optogenetic Brain Perturbations.
Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Characterizing optogenetically mediated rebound effects in anaesthetized mouse primary visual cortex.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- State-dependent central synaptic regulation by GLP-1 is essential for energy homeostasis.Nature metabolism · 2025Article
- Article
- Automatic OptoDrive for Extracellular Recordings and Optogenetic Stimulation in Freely Moving Mice.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Nucleus accumbens D2-expressing neurons: Balancing reward and licking disruption through rhythmic optogenetic stimulation.PloS one · 2025Article
- Social context modulates active avoidance: Contributions of the anterior cingulate cortex in male and female rats.Neurobiology of stress · 2025Article
- Active avoidance recruits the anterior cingulate cortex regardless of social context in male and female rats.Research square · 2024Article
- Spatio-temporal activation patterns of neuronal population evoked by optostimulation and the comparison to electrical microstimulation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Amplified cortical neural responses as animals learn to use novel activity patterns.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- Thalamocortical loops as temporal demodulators across senses.Communications biology · 2023Review
- Increments in visual motion coherence are more readily detected than decrements.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Optogenetic Stimulation of Midbrain Dopamine Neurons Produces Striatal Serotonin Release.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2022Article
- A genetically identified population of layer 4 neurons in auditory cortex that contributes to pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How do animals experience brain manipulations? Optogenetics has allowed us to manipulate selectively and interrogate neural circuits underlying brain function in health and disease. However, little is known about whether mice can detect and learn from arbitrary optogenetic perturbations from a wide range of brain regions to guide behavior. To address this issue, mice were trained to report optogenetic brain perturbations to obtain rewards and avoid punishments. Here, we found that mice can perceive optogenetic manipulations regardless of the perturbed brain area, rewarding effects, or the stimulation of glutamatergic, GABAergic, and dopaminergic cell types. We named this phenomenon optoception, a perceptible signal internally generated from perturbing the brain, as occurs with interoception. Using optoception, mice can learn to execute two different sets of instructions based on the laser frequency. Importantly, optoception can occur either activating or silencing a single cell type. Moreover, stimulation of two brain regions in a single mouse uncovered that the optoception induced by one brain region does not necessarily transfer to a second not previously stimulated area, suggesting a different sensation is experienced from each site. After learning, they can indistinctly use randomly interleaved perturbations from both brain regions to guide behavior. Collectively taken, our findings revealed that mice's brains could "monitor" perturbations of their self-activity, albeit indirectly, perhaps via interoception or as a discriminative stimulus, opening a new way to introduce information to the brain and control brain-computer interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.