Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35714887›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Prefrontal cortical activation associated with prospective memory while walking around a real-world street environment.

Paul W Burgess, James Crum, Paola Pinti, Clarisse Aichelburg, Dominic Oliver, Frida Lind, Sarah Power, Elizabeth Swingler, Uzair Hakim, Arcangelo Merla and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Combining video telemetry and wearable MEG for naturalistic imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Paul W BurgessInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK. Electronic address: p.burgess@ucl.ac.uk.
James CrumInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK.
Paola PintiDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, UK.
Clarisse AichelburgInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK.
Dominic OliverInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK.
Frida LindInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK.
Sarah PowerDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, UK.
Elizabeth SwinglerInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK.
Uzair HakimDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, UK.
Arcangelo MerlaInfrared Imaging Lab, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technology (ITAB), Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Sam GilbertInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK.
Ilias TachtsidisDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, UK.
Antonia HamiltonInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S003134/1Wellcome Trust 104580/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rostral PFC (area 10) activation is common during prospective memory (PM) tasks. But it is not clear what mental processes these activations index. Three candidate explanations from cognitive neuroscience theory are: (i) monitoring of the environment; (ii) spontaneous intention retrieval; (iii) a combination of the two. These explanations make different predictions about the temporal and spatial patterns of activation that would be seen in rostral PFC in naturalistic settings. Accordingly, we plotted functional events in PFC using portable fNIRS while people were carrying out a PM task outside the lab and responding to cues when they were encountered, to decide between these explanations. Nineteen people were asked to walk around a street in London, U.K. and perform various tasks while also remembering to respond to prospective memory (PM) cues when they detected them. The prospective memory cues could be either social (involving greeting a person) or non-social (interacting with a parking meter) in nature. There were also a number of contrast conditions which allowed us to determine activation specifically related to the prospective memory components of the tasks. We found that maintaining both social and non-social intentions was associated with widespread activation within medial and right hemisphere rostral prefrontal cortex (BA 10), in agreement with numerous previous lab-based fMRI studies of prospective memory. In addition, increased activation was found within lateral prefrontal cortex (BA 45 and 46) when people were maintaining a social intention compared to a non-social one. The data were then subjected to a GLM-based method for automatic identification of functional events (AIDE), and the position of the participants at the time of the activation events were located on a map of the physical space. The results showed that the spatial and temporal distribution of these events was not random, but aggregated around areas in which the participants appeared to retrieve their future intentions (i.e., where they saw intentional cues), as well as where they executed them. Functional events were detected most frequently in BA 10 during the PM conditions compared to other regions and tasks. Mobile fNIRS can be used to measure higher cognitive functions of the prefrontal cortex in "real world" situations outside the laboratory in freely ambulant individuals. The addition of a "brain-first" approach to the data permits the experimenter to determine not only when haemodynamic changes occur, but also where the participant was when it happened. This can be extremely valuable when trying to link brain and cognition.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMental RecallPrefrontal CortexWalkingEcologicalfNIRSFrontal lobeFunctional near-infrared spectroscopyProspective memorySocial neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID35714887
PMCPMC10509823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.