ArticleCurrent protocols2022
Cost-effective Purification of Membrane Proteins using a Dual-detergent Strategy.
Article in Current protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming challenges in the production of a human-like L-asparaginase: advanced strategies for expression and purification.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Characterization of a novel MgtE homolog and its structural dynamics in membrane mimetics.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Editorial: Structural dynamics of membrane proteins, Volume II.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the mechanisms of membrane protein function is critical for biomedical research and drug discovery as membrane proteins constitute ∼30% of the proteins encoded by the genomes of both lower and higher organisms and are targets for two-thirds of approved drugs worldwide. Significant progress has been made in engineering host expression systems for large-scale production of membrane proteins and in determining their three-dimensional high-resolution structures. Despite these efforts, the study of membrane proteins at the atomic level is challenging due to poor expression and extraction, low yields of functional protein, and the complexity and heterogeneity of source membranes. Structural and spectroscopic studies of any membrane protein require that the protein be extracted from its native membranes into a membrane-mimetic stable environment, which is often achieved by the use of detergents. Unfortunately, there is no magic detergent that can extract all membrane proteins and successful extraction often requires a thorough screen of detergents. Furthermore, membrane protein purification in general and the detergents used are very expensive, which puts a financial constraint on sophisticated membrane protein studies. To overcome this hurdle, a dual-detergent strategy has recently been developed and successfully applied to purify various classes of pure, stable, and functionally relevant membrane proteins in a cost-effective manner. This strategy uses an inexpensive detergent for solubilization of the desired protein from membranes and a second detergent during protein purification. In the Basic Protocol, we describe the dual-detergent strategy to significantly reduce the overall purification cost of a bacterial membrane protein using the magnesium ion channel MgtE as an example. Support Protocols are also provided for selecting a suitable E. coli strain for protein expression and the optimal detergent(s) for membrane protein solubilization. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Expression, membrane solubilization, and cost-effective purification of MgtE Support Protocol 1: Selecting a suitable E. coli strain for optimal protein expression Support Protocol 2: Identification of suitable detergents for membrane protein solubilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.