Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35714350›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2022

CUT&RUN for Chromatin Profiling in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Felicity J Emerson, Siu Sylvia Lee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. High-resolution global recombination mapping inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. High-Efficiency Genomic Mapping of Chromatin-Associated Targets with CUT&RUN.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  6. The Binding Landscape of an Essential Nuclear Hormone Receptor inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felicity J EmersonDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Siu Sylvia LeeDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Systematic Analysis of C elegans Longevity DeterminantsR01AG024425 · NIA · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI Siu Sylvia Lee · 2004 to 2026
$8.5M
Investigate the Transcriptional Co-factors of DAF-16/FOXO in C. elegansR56AG024425 · NIA · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, SIU SYLVIA · 2009 to 2009
$383k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG024425NIA NIH HHS R56 AG024425NIH HHS R01 AG024425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cleavage under targets and release using nuclease (CUT&RUN) is a recently developed chromatin profiling technique that uses a targeted micrococcal nuclease cleavage strategy to obtain high-resolution binding profiles of protein factors or to map histones with specific post-translational modifications. Due to its high sensitivity, CUT&RUN allows quality binding profiles to be obtained with only a fraction of the starting material and sequencing depth typically required for other chromatin profiling techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation. Although CUT&RUN has been widely adopted in multiple model systems, it has rarely been utilized in Caenorhabditis elegans, a model system of great importance to genomic research. Cell dissociation techniques, which are required for this approach, can be challenging in C. elegans due to the toughness of the worm's cuticle and the sensitivity of the cells themselves. Here, we describe a robust CUT&RUN protocol for use in C. elegans to determine the genome-wide localization of protein factors and specific histone marks. With a simple protocol utilizing live, uncrosslinked tissue as the starting material, performing CUT&RUN in worms has the potential to produce physiologically relevant data at a higher resolution than chromatin immunoprecipitation. This protocol involves a simple dissociation step to uniformly permeabilize worms while avoiding sample loss or cell damage, resulting in high-quality CUT&RUN profiles with as few as 100 worms and detectable signal with as few as 10 worms. This represents a significant advancement over chromatin immunoprecipitation, which typically uses thousands or hundreds of thousands of worms for a single experiment. The protocols presented here provide a detailed description of worm growth, sample preparation, CUT&RUN workflow, library preparation for high-throughput sequencing, and a basic overview of data analysis, making CUT&RUN simple and accessible for any worm lab. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Growth and synchronization of C. elegans Basic Protocol 2: Worm dissociation, sample preparation, and optimization Basic Protocol 3: CUT&RUN chromatin profiling Alternate Protocol: Improving CUT&RUN signal using a secondary antibody Basic Protocol 4: CUT&RUN library preparation for Illumina high-throughput sequencing Basic Protocol 5: Basic data analysis using Linux.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansChromatinAnimalsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationHistone CodeHistonesChromatinHistonesCaenorhabditis eleganschromatinCUT&RUNDNA-protein interactionshistone modification

Identifiers

PMID35714350
PMCPMC9219583
OpenAlexW4283065853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.