Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35714310›Full record

Observational studyCancer2022

Real-life data on treatment and outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer: An observational, multinational cohort study (RESPONSE trial).

Christian Marth, Miguel Henriques Abreu, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Karoliina M Aro, Maria de Lurdes Batarda, Dorry Boll, Anne Weng Ekmann-Gade, Ulla-Maija Haltia, Jesper Hansen, Ala Jabri Haug and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07567573 (Assessment of the Prognostic Impact of the Published European Society of Gynecologic Oncology Quality Indicators for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07567573 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Prognostic Impact of the Published European Society of Gynecologic Oncology Quality Indicators for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorEuropean Society of Gynaecological OncologyRan2023 to 2024Enrolled11,383ConditionsD010051, Ovarian Cancer, Advanced-stage Ovarian Cancer, FIGO Stages III and IVArmsPreoperative Evaluations, Cytoreductive Surgery, Perioperative Management, Systemic Chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Christian MarthDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8965-9981
Miguel Henriques AbreuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Klaus Kaae AndersenMedical Affairs, AstraZeneca Nordic, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karoliina M AroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Maria de Lurdes BatardaChampalimaud Foundation (Fundação Champalimaud), Lisbon, Portugal.
Dorry BollCatharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Anne Weng Ekmann-GadeDepartment of Gynecology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ulla-Maija HaltiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jesper HansenMedical Affairs, AstraZeneca Nordic, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ala Jabri HaugDepartment of Gynecological Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Claus HøgdallDepartment of Gynecology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob KorachSheba Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Heini LassusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Kristina LindemannDepartment of Gynecological Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Els Van NieuwenhuysenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Petronella B OttevangerNijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Stephan PolterauerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Tine Henrichsen SchnackDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Odense, Odense, Denmark.
University of Helsinki · FIAstraZeneca (France) · FROslo University Hospital · NORadboud University Nijmegen · NLRigshospitalet · DKChampalimaud Foundation · PTInnsbruck Medical University · ATInstituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTMedical University of Vienna · ATOdense University Hospital · DKTel Aviv University · ILUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to describe the treatment strategies and outcomes for women with newly diagnosed advanced high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer (OC).

methodsThis observational study collected real-world medical record data from eight Western countries on the diagnostic workup, clinical outcomes, and treatment of adult women with newly diagnosed advanced (Stage III-IV) high-grade serous or endometrioid OC. Patients were selected backward in time from April 1, 2018 (the index date), with a target of 120 patients set per country, followed for ≥20 months.

resultsOf the 1119 women included, 66.9% had Stage III disease, 11.7% had a deleterious BRCA mutation, and 26.6% received bevacizumab; 40.8% and 39.3% underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS), respectively. Of the patients who underwent PDS, 55.5% had no visible residual disease (VRD); 63.9% of the IDS patients had no VRD. According to physician-assessed responses (at the first assessment after diagnosis and treatment), 53.2% of the total population had a complete response and 25.7% had a partial response to first-line chemotherapy after surgery. After ≥20 months of follow-up, 32.9% of the patients were disease-free, 46.4% had progressive disease, and 20.6% had died. Bevacizumab use had a significant positive effect on overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91; p = .01). A deleterious BRCA status had a significant positive effect on progression-free survival (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84; p < .01).

conclusionsWomen with advanced high-grade serous or endometrioid OC have a poor prognosis. Bevacizumab use and a deleterious BRCA status were found to improve survival in this real-world population. LAY SUMMARY: Patients with advanced (Stage III or IV) ovarian cancer (OC) have a poor prognosis. The standard treatment options of surgery and chemotherapy extend life beyond diagnosis for 5 years or more in only approximately 45% of patients. This study was aimed at describing the standard of care in eight Western countries and estimating how many patients who are diagnosed with high-grade serous or endometrioid OC could potentially be eligible for first-line poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance therapy. The results highlight the poor prognosis for these patients and suggest that a significant proportion (79%) would potentially be eligible for first-line PARPi maintenance treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, EndometrioidOvarian NeoplasmsAdultBevacizumabCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCohort StudiesFemaleHumansNeoplasm, ResidualProgression-Free SurvivalBevacizumabbevacizumabfirst-line treatmentovarian cancerpoly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitorreal-world data

Identifiers

PMID35714310
PMCPMC9545328
OpenAlexW4283077033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.