Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35714293›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Physicians' Perceptions of Telemedicine Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Cross-sectional Study.

Sarah Idriss, Abdullah Aldhuhayyan, Ahmad Abdullah Alanazi, Walaa Alasaadi, Reem Alharbi, Ghadah Alshahwan, Mohammad Baitalmal, Wadi Alonazi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Review on Teledermatology in Saudi Arabia: Framework, Barriers, and Opportunities.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Idriss *Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9361-325X
Abdullah Aldhuhayyan *Emergency Medical Services, Saudi Red Crescent Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6683-9915
Ahmad Abdullah Alanazi *Respiratory Therapy Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4997-0270
Walaa Alasaadi *Health Administration Department, King Saud University, College of Business, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6692-8608
Reem Alharbi *Home Healthcare Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8626-9398
Ghadah Alshahwan *Home Healthcare Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9500-3682
Mohammad Baitalmal *Quantitative Analysis Department, King Saud University, College of Business Administration, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3684-4988
Wadi AlonaziHealth Administration Department, King Saud University, College of Business Administration, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3850-4437
King Saud University · SAKing Fahd Medical City · SAKing Abdulaziz Medical City · SAMinistry of Health · SASaudi Arabian Monetary Authority · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe term "telemedicine" refers to the use of communication technology to deliver health care remotely. The COVID-19 pandemic had substantial impacts on health care delivery from 2020 onward, and it was necessary to adapt high-quality care in a manner that limited the potential for viral exposure of both patients and health care workers. Physicians employed video, phone, and electronic written (e-consultation) visits, all of which provided quality of care comparable to that of face-to-face visits while reducing barriers of adopting telemedicine.

objectiveThis study sought to assess physicians' perspectives and attitudes regarding the use of telemedicine in Riyadh hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main objects of assessment were as follows: (1) physicians' experience using telemedicine, (2) physicians' willingness to use telemedicine in the future, (3) physicians' perceptions of patient experiences, and (4) the influence of telemedicine on burnout.

methodsThis study employed SurveyMonkey to develop and distribute an anonymous 28-question cross-sectional survey among physicians across all specialty disciplines in Riyadh hospitals. A chi-square test was used to determine the level of association between variables, with significance set to P<.05.

resultsThe survey was distributed among 500 physicians who experienced telemedicine between October 2021 and December 2021. A total of 362 doctors were included, of whom 28.7% (n=104) were consultants, 30.4% (n=110) were specialists, and 40.9% (n=148) were residents. Male doctors formed the majority 56.1% (n=203), and female doctors accounted for 43.9% (n=159). Overall, 34% (n=228) agreed or somewhat agreed that the "quality of care during telemedicine is comparable with that of face-to-face visits." Approximately 70% (n=254) believed that telemedicine consultation is cost-effective. Regarding burnout, 4.1% (n=15), 7.5% (n=27), and 27.3% (n=99) of the doctors reported feeling burnout every day, a few times a week, and a few times per month, respectively.

conclusionsThe physicians had generally favorable attitudes toward telemedicine, believing that its quality of health care delivery is comparable to that of in-person care. However, further research is necessary to determine how physicians' attitudes toward telemedicine have changed since the pandemic and how this virtual technology can be used to improve physicians' professional and personal well-being.

Indexed as

burnoutCOVID-19patient experienceperceptionphysicianstelemedicinevirtual

Identifiers

PMID35714293
PMCPMC9278404
OpenAlexW4283122581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.