Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35714273›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Clinical evaluation of the lot-to-lot consistency of an enterovirus 71 vaccine in a commercial-scale phase IV clinical trial.

Jinhua Chen, Pengfei Jin, Xiaoqi Chen, Qunying Mao, Fanyue Meng, Xinguo Li, Wei Chen, Meizhi Du, Fan Gao, Pei Liu and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jinhua ChenDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Pengfei JinDepartment of Vaccine Clinical Evaluation, Jiangsu Provincial Center of Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaoqi ChenDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Qunying MaoDivision of Hepatitis virus and Enterovirus Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Fanyue MengDepartment of Vaccine Clinical Evaluation, Jiangsu Provincial Center of Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xinguo LiDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Meizhi DuDepartment of Disease Prevention and Control, Pei County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Pei County, Jiangsu, China.
Fan GaoDivision of Hepatitis virus and Enterovirus Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Pei LiuSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xiujuan LiDepartment of Disease Prevention and Control, Pei County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Pei County, Jiangsu, China.
Changfu GuoDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Tingbo XieDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Weiwei LuDepartment of Research and Development, National Vaccine & Serum Institute, Beijing, China.
Qingliang LiDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Li LiDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xing YanDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiang GuoDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hongqiao DuDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiuling LiDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Kai DuanDepartment of Research and Development, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Fengcai ZhuDepartment of Vaccine Clinical Evaluation, Jiangsu Provincial Center of Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1644-0006
Wuhan Institute of Bioengineering · CNShanghai Research Institute of Chemical Industry · CNJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CNSoutheast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the immunogenicity, safety and lot-to-lot consistency of an inactivated enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine cultured in bioreactors with different specifications after full immunization.

methodsA randomized, double-blind trial was performed in 3,000 children aged 6 ~ 35 months with six vaccine batches, which were prepared in 40 L and 150 L bioreactors for three consecutive batches respectively. Children were immunized on day 0 and 28, serum samples were collected on day 0 and 56, and neutralizing antibody titers were determined by the microcytopathic method. Immediate reactions were recorded within 30 min, local and systemic symptoms were recorded within 0 ~ 28 days, and serious adverse events were recorded within 6 months.

resultsAfter immunization with two doses of the inactivated EV71 vaccine, the neutralizing antibody GMT was 825.52 ± 4.09, and the positive conversion rate was 96.18%, with no significant difference. The 95% CI of the serum neutralizing antibody GMT ratio between the two groups after immunization with the three vaccine batches produced in the 150 L and 40 L bioreactors ranged from .67 ~ 1.5. The overall incidence of adverse reactions, mainly grade 1 reactions, for all 6 batches from 0 to 28 days after vaccination was 49.62%, with no significant difference (p = .8736). The incidence of systemic adverse reactions, primarily fever and diarrhea, was 45.14%; the incidence of local adverse reactions, primarily erythema and tenderness, was 9.43%.

conclusionThe EV71 vaccine was highly immunogenic and safe in children aged 6-35 months, and 6 consecutive batches produced by the two bioreactors with different specifications were consistent.

Indexed as

EnterovirusEnterovirus A, HumanAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralChildDouble-Blind MethodHumansVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralVaccines, InactivatedconsistencyimmunogenicityInactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine (Vero Cell)safety

Identifiers

PMID35714273
PMCPMC9897631
OpenAlexW4283026081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.