Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35714154›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Monitoring sustainable development goal 5.2: Cross-country cross-time invariance of measures for intimate partner violence.

Kathryn M Yount, Irina Bergenfeld, Nishat Mhamud, Cari Jo Clark, Nadine J Kaslow, Yuk Fai Cheong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intimate Partner Violence inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathryn M YountHubert Department of Global Health and Department of Sociology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1917-1574
Irina BergenfeldHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Nishat MhamudHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Cari Jo ClarkHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Nadine J KaslowDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Yuk Fai CheongDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8888-4864

Funding

Global Validation of Measures for Intimate Partner ViolenceR01HD099224 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, CARI JO, YOUNT, KATHRYN M · 2019 to 2021
$929k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe persistence and impacts of violence against women motivated Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 5.2 to end such violence. Global psychometric assessment of cross-country, cross-time invariance of items measuring intimate partner violence (IPV) is needed to confirm their utility for comparing and monitoring national trends.

methodsAnalyses of seven physical-IPV items included 377,500 ever-partnered women across 20 countries (44 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS)). Analyses of five controlling-behaviors items included 371,846 women across 19 countries (42 DHS). We performed multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) to assess within-country, cross-time invariance of each item set. Pooled analyses tested cross-country, cross-time invariance using DHSs that showed configural invariance in country-level multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFAs). Alignment optimization tested approximate invariance of each item set in the pooled sample of all datasets, and in the subset of countries showing metric invariance over at least two repeated cross-sectional surveys in country-level MGCFAs.

resultsIn country-level MGCFAs, physical-IPV items and controlling-behaviors items functioned equivalently in repeated survey administrations in 12 and 11 countries, respectively. In MGCFA testing cross-country, cross-time invariance in pooled samples, neither item set was strictly equivalent; however, the physical-IPV items were approximately invariant. Controlling-behaviors items did not show approximate cross-country and cross-time invariance in the full sample or the sub-sample showing country-level metric invariance.

conclusionPhysical-IPV items approached approximate invariance across 20 countries and were approximately invariant in 11 countries with repeated cross-sectional surveys. Controlling-behaviors items were cross-time invariant within 11 countries but did not show cross-country, cross-time approximate invariance. Currently, the physical-IPV item set is more robust for monitoring progress toward SDG5.2.1, to end IPV against women.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceSustainable DevelopmentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsSexual Partners

Identifiers

PMID35714154
PMCPMC9205513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.