Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35714093›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2022

Joint Optimization of k-t Sampling Pattern and Reconstruction of DCE MRI for Pharmacokinetic Parameter Estimation.

Jiaren Zou, Yue Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Learning Task-Specific Strategies for Accelerated MRI.IEEE transactions on computational imaging · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiaren Zou
Yue Cao

Funding

Optimizing MRI for Radiation Therapy Treatment PlanningR01EB016079 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BALTER, JAMES M, CAO, YUE · 2013 to 2022
$3.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work proposes to develop and evaluate a deep learning framework that jointly optimizes k-t sampling patterns and reconstruction for head and neck dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI aiming to reduce bias and uncertainty of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimation. 2D Cartesian phase encoding k-space subsampling patterns for a 3D spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR) sequence along a time course of DCE MRI were jointly optimized in a deep learning-based dynamic MRI reconstruction network by a loss function concerning both reconstruction image quality and PK parameter estimation accuracy. During training, temporal k-space data sharing scheme was optimized as well. The proposed method was trained and tested by multi-coil complex digital reference objects of DCE images (mcDROs). The PK parameters estimated by the proposed method were compared with two published iterative DCE MRI reconstruction schemes using normalized root mean squared errors (NRMSEs) and Bland-Altman analysis at temporal resolutions of [Formula: see text] = 2s, 3s, 4s, and 5s, which correspond to undersampling rates of R = 50, 34, 25, and 20. The proposed method achieved low PK parameter NRMSEs at all four temporal resolutions compared with the benchmark methods on testing mcDROs. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that the proposed method reduced PK parameter estimation bias and uncertainty in tumor regions at temporal resolution of 2s. The proposed method also showed robustness to contrast arrival timing variations across patients. This work provides a potential way to increase PK parameter estimation accuracy and precision, and thus facilitate the clinical translation of DCE MRI.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID35714093
PMCPMC9653303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.