ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2022
Joint Optimization of k-t Sampling Pattern and Reconstruction of DCE MRI for Pharmacokinetic Parameter Estimation.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep-Learning-Based Image Reconstruction to Improve End-Diastolic and Systolic Cardiac T1 Mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Improved Spiral Projection MR Fingerprinting via Memory-Efficient Synergic Optimization of 3D Spiral Trajectory, Image Reconstruction and Parameter Estimation (SOTIP).IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
- Deep learning for accelerated and robust MRI reconstruction.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Learning Task-Specific Strategies for Accelerated MRI.IEEE transactions on computational imaging · 2024Article
- Retrospective quantification of clinical abdominal DCE-MRI using pharmacokinetics-informed deep learning: a proof-of-concept study.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work proposes to develop and evaluate a deep learning framework that jointly optimizes k-t sampling patterns and reconstruction for head and neck dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI aiming to reduce bias and uncertainty of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimation. 2D Cartesian phase encoding k-space subsampling patterns for a 3D spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR) sequence along a time course of DCE MRI were jointly optimized in a deep learning-based dynamic MRI reconstruction network by a loss function concerning both reconstruction image quality and PK parameter estimation accuracy. During training, temporal k-space data sharing scheme was optimized as well. The proposed method was trained and tested by multi-coil complex digital reference objects of DCE images (mcDROs). The PK parameters estimated by the proposed method were compared with two published iterative DCE MRI reconstruction schemes using normalized root mean squared errors (NRMSEs) and Bland-Altman analysis at temporal resolutions of [Formula: see text] = 2s, 3s, 4s, and 5s, which correspond to undersampling rates of R = 50, 34, 25, and 20. The proposed method achieved low PK parameter NRMSEs at all four temporal resolutions compared with the benchmark methods on testing mcDROs. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that the proposed method reduced PK parameter estimation bias and uncertainty in tumor regions at temporal resolution of 2s. The proposed method also showed robustness to contrast arrival timing variations across patients. This work provides a potential way to increase PK parameter estimation accuracy and precision, and thus facilitate the clinical translation of DCE MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.