Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35713948›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Obligate sexual reproduction of a homothallic fungus closely related to the

Andrew Ryan Passer, Shelly Applen Clancey, Terrance Shea, Márcia David-Palma, Anna Floyd Averette, Teun Boekhout, Betina M Porcel, Minou Nowrousian, Christina A Cuomo, Sheng Sun and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tracing the evolution and genomic dynamics of mating-type loci inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative genomics ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Divergent paths:Current medical mycology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. On the evolution of variation in sexual reproduction through the prism of eukaryotic microbes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew Ryan Passer *Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Shelly Applen Clancey *Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Terrance SheaBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States.
Márcia David-PalmaDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Anna Floyd AveretteDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Teun BoekhoutWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Betina M PorcelGénomique Métabolique, CNRS, University Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.
Minou NowrousianLehrstuhl für Molekulare und Zelluläre Botanik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0075-6695
Christina A CuomoBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5778-960X
Sheng SunDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2895-1153
Joseph HeitmanDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6369-5995
Marco A CoelhoDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5716-0561
Duke University · USBroad Institute · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitute for Biodiversity · DERuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

Large Scale Sequencing and Analysis of GenomesU54HG003067 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GABRIEL, STACEY, LANDER, ERIC S · 2004 to 2015
$568.6M
Structure, function, and evolution of the Cryptococcus MAT locusR01AI050113 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HEITMAN, JOSEPH · 2002 to 2024
$8.5M
ROLE OF CALCINEURIN IN C. NEOFORMANS MATING AND FRUITINGR01AI039115 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HEITMAN, JOSEPH · 1997 to 2025
$6.7M
Genetics of Cryptococcus sexual reproductionR37AI039115 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HEITMAN, JOSEPH · 2011 to 2020
$4.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG003067NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI039115NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI050113NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI039115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<title>eLife digest</title>. Fungi are enigmatic organisms that flourish in soil, on decaying plants, or during infection of animals or plants. Growing in myriad forms, from single-celled yeast to multicellular molds and mushrooms, fungi have also evolved a variety of strategies to reproduce. Normally, fungi reproduce in one of two ways: either they reproduce asexually, with one individual producing a new individual identical to itself, or they reproduce sexually, with two individuals of different 'mating types' contributing to produce a new individual. However, individuals of some species exhibit 'homothallism' or self-fertility: these individuals can produce reproductive cells that are universally compatible, and therefore can reproduce sexually with themselves or with any other cell in the population. Homothallism has evolved multiple times throughout the fungal kingdom, suggesting it confers advantage when population numbers are low or mates are hard to find. Yet some homothallic fungi been overlooked compared to heterothallic species, whose mating types have been well characterised. Understanding the genetic basis of homothallism and how it evolved in different species can provide insights into pathogenic species that cause fungal disease. With that in mind, Passer, Clancey et al. explored the genetic basis of homothallism in Passer, Clancey et al. showed that Passer, Clancey et al. also found that, unlike other This work offers new insights into how different modes of sexual reproduction have evolved in fungi. It also provides another interesting case of how genome plasticity and evolutionary pressures can produce similar outcomes, homothallism, via different evolutionary paths. Lastly, assembling the complete genome of

Indexed as

Cryptococcus neoformansGenes, Mating Type, FungalBiological EvolutionHumansReproductionSaccharomyces cerevisiaecryptococcusCryptococcus depauperatusgeneticsgenomicshomothallism in fungiinfectious diseasemeiosismicrobiologysexual reproduction

Identifiers

PMID35713948
PMCPMC9296135
OpenAlexW4283016268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.