ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022
Detection of rotational errors in single-isocenter multiple-target radiosurgery: Is a routine off-axis Winston-Lutz test necessary?
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AAPM-RSS Medical Physics Practice Guideline 9.b: SRS-SBRT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Guideline
- Distance-adaptive geometric margins for residual rotational uncertainty in single-isocenter multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Implementation of deep learning with convolutional block attention module for detecting collimator rotation errors in stereotactic radiosurgery quality assurance.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Improving dose delivery in non-coplanar cranial SRS: Stereoscopic x-ray-guided mitigation of table walkout errors.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of artificial intelligence and optical image recognition techniques used in OneIso, an off-axis Winston-Lutz quality assurance phantom.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2024Article
- Off-iso Winston-Lutz test on seven linear accelerators.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the effect of sagging correction calibration errors in radiotherapy software on image matching.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- A multi-institutional trial evaluating the use of an integrated quality assurance phantom for frameless single-isocenter multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Detection of rotational errors in single-isocenter multiple-target radiosurgery: Is a routine off-axis Winston-Lutz test necessary?Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Feasibility of Using Machine Performance Check-enhanced Couch Check as a Daily Surrogate for Multisphere Winston-Lutz Testing in Single-isocenter Multitarget Stereotactic Radiosurgery.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRecently the use of linear accelerator (linac)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has increased, including single-isocenter multiple-target SRS. The workload of medical physicists has grown as a result and so has the necessity of maximizing the efficiency of quality assurance (QA). This study aimed to determine if measurement-based patient-specific QA with a high-spatial-resolution dosimeter is sensitive to rotational errors, potentially reducing the need for routine off-axis Winston-Lutz (WL) testing.
methodsThe impact of rotational errors along gantry, couch, and collimator axes on dose coverage of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) was determined with a 1-mm GTV/PTV expansion margin. Two techniques, the off-axis WL test using the StereoPHAN MultiMet-WL Cube (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, Florida, USA) and patient-specific QA using the SRS MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, Florida, USA), were assessed on their ability to detect introduced errors before target coverage was compromised. These findings were also considered in the context of routine machine QA of rotational axis calibrations.
resultsRotational errors significantly impacted PTV dose coverage, especially in the couch angle. GTV dose coverage remained unaffected except for with large couch angle errors (≥1.5°). The off-axis WL test was shown to be sensitive to rotational errors with results consistently exceeding tolerance levels when or before coverage fell below departmentally accepted limits. Although patient-specific QA using the SRS MapCHECK was previously validated for SRS, this study showed inconsistency in detection of rotational errors.
conclusionsIt is recommended that off-axis WL testing be conducted regularly to supplement routine monthly machine QA, as it is sensitive to errors that patient-specific QA may not detect. This frequency should be determined by individual departments, with consideration of GTV-PTV margins used, limitations on target off-axis distances, and routine mechanical QA results for particular linacs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.