Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35713881›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

Detection of rotational errors in single-isocenter multiple-target radiosurgery: Is a routine off-axis Winston-Lutz test necessary?

Lauren M M Pudsey, Giordano Biasi, Anna Ralston, Anatoly Rosenfeld, Joel Poder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. AAPM-RSS Medical Physics Practice Guideline 9.b: SRS-SBRT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Off-iso Winston-Lutz test on seven linear accelerators.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lauren M M PudseyCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, School of Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Giordano BiasiCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, School of Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Anna RalstonSt George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Anatoly RosenfeldCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, School of Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Joel PoderCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, School of Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecently the use of linear accelerator (linac)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has increased, including single-isocenter multiple-target SRS. The workload of medical physicists has grown as a result and so has the necessity of maximizing the efficiency of quality assurance (QA). This study aimed to determine if measurement-based patient-specific QA with a high-spatial-resolution dosimeter is sensitive to rotational errors, potentially reducing the need for routine off-axis Winston-Lutz (WL) testing.

methodsThe impact of rotational errors along gantry, couch, and collimator axes on dose coverage of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) was determined with a 1-mm GTV/PTV expansion margin. Two techniques, the off-axis WL test using the StereoPHAN MultiMet-WL Cube (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, Florida, USA) and patient-specific QA using the SRS MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, Florida, USA), were assessed on their ability to detect introduced errors before target coverage was compromised. These findings were also considered in the context of routine machine QA of rotational axis calibrations.

resultsRotational errors significantly impacted PTV dose coverage, especially in the couch angle. GTV dose coverage remained unaffected except for with large couch angle errors (≥1.5°). The off-axis WL test was shown to be sensitive to rotational errors with results consistently exceeding tolerance levels when or before coverage fell below departmentally accepted limits. Although patient-specific QA using the SRS MapCHECK was previously validated for SRS, this study showed inconsistency in detection of rotational errors.

conclusionsIt is recommended that off-axis WL testing be conducted regularly to supplement routine monthly machine QA, as it is sensitive to errors that patient-specific QA may not detect. This frequency should be determined by individual departments, with consideration of GTV-PTV margins used, limitations on target off-axis distances, and routine mechanical QA results for particular linacs.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryHumansParticle AcceleratorsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedoff-axis Winston-Lutzsingle-isocenter multiple-targetstereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID35713881
PMCPMC9512335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.