Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35713808›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Development of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Track for Internal Medicine Residents.

Robert Nathanson, Minh-Phuong T Le, Kevin C Proud, Charles M LoPresti, Elizabeth K Haro, Michael J Mader, Jane O'Rorke, Patricia I Wathen, Nilam J Soni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robert NathansonMedicine Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA. nathansonr3@uthscsa.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4443-7525
Minh-Phuong T LeDivision of General & Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Kevin C ProudDivision of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Department of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Charles M LoPrestiHospital Medicine Service, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Elizabeth K HaroMedicine Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Michael J MaderMedicine Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Jane O'RorkeMedicine Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Patricia I WathenDivision of General & Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Nilam J SoniMedicine Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

Evaluation of Implementation of a National Point-of-care Ultrasound Training ProgramI50HX002263 · VA · SOUTH TEXAS VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI SONI, NILAM · 2020 to 2021
–
HSRD VA I50 HX002263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training has been increasing among internal medicine (IM) residency programs, but few programs can provide longitudinal training due to barriers such as lack of trained faculty.

aimDescribe the development of a longitudinal POCUS track for IM residents using local and external resources, including a national POCUS certificate program.

settingUniversity-based IM residency program affiliated with a public and veterans affairs hospital.

participantsTwelve IM residents from 2018 to 2021. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Residents complete a national POCUS certificate program by attending live courses and completing online modules, an image portfolio, and final knowledge/skills assessments. Locally, residents participate in 1-month procedure and diagnostic POCUS rotations and provide peer-to-peer POCUS teaching of residents and medical students. PROGRAM EVALUATION: The POCUS track increased residents' use and comfort with diagnostic and procedural applications. All residents rated being satisfied or very satisfied with the track and would recommend it to prospective applicants (100%). The most commonly reported barriers to utilizing POCUS per residents were time constraints (83%), lack of available ultrasound equipment (83%), and lack of trained faculty (58%). DISCUSSION: IM residency programs with limited faculty expertise in POCUS can leverage external resources to provide longitudinal POCUS training to its residents.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyStudents, MedicalHumansPoint-of-Care SystemsProspective StudiesUltrasonographyeducationpoint of careretentionultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35713808
PMCPMC9205286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.