Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35713720›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2022

Efficacy and satisfaction of asynchronous TeleHealth care compared to in-person visits following colorectal surgical resection.

Catherine C Beauharnais, Susanna S Hill, Paul R Sturrock, Jennifer S Davids, Karim Alavi, Justin A Maykel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05084131 (Feasibility of Online Visit Format for Post-Operative Visit After Colon and Rectal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05084131 completednot on this map

Feasibility of Online Visit Format for Post-Operative Visit After Colon and Rectal Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Massachusetts, WorcesterRan2019 to 2021Enrolled33ConditionsColorectal SurgeryArmsUse of an online questionnaire as follow-up after abdominal colorectal surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine C BeauharnaisUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. Catherine.beauharnais@umassmemorial.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9054-150X
Susanna S HillDepartment of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Paul R SturrockUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Jennifer S DavidsUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Karim AlaviUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Justin A MaykelUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe feasibility of remote visits following abdominal colorectal surgery has not been studied in relation to efficacy, patient satisfaction, and surgeon satisfaction. This study aims to assess reliability and satisfaction with a web-based questionnaire for post-operative visits following abdominal colorectal surgery.

methodsThis was a prospective single-arm cohort study at single-tertiary care center during admission for abdominal colorectal surgery. Using a web-based patient portal, patients completed a questionnaire 48 h prior to their scheduled in-person follow-up visits and submitted photographs of their incisions. Surgeons reviewed patient-entered data and responded within 24 h. Following the subsequent in-person visit, surgeons completed questionnaires to compare the accuracy of the web-based vs. in-person evaluations. Lastly, patients and surgeons completed separate satisfaction surveys after the in-person visits.

resultsA total of 33 patients were enrolled, of which 30 (90.9%) successfully completed the web questionnaire. Providers reported the online questionnaire to be concordant with the in-person visit in 90% of cases. Of the patients who completed the study, only half found the survey alone to be acceptable for follow-up. Patients spent significantly less time completing the online questionnaire (≤ 10 min) than in-person visits, including travel time (75 min, IQR 50-100). Only 12 patients (40%) uploaded photographs of their incisions. During in-person visits, management changes were employed in four patients (13.3%), of which 3 required treatment of superficial surgical site infections (10%).

conclusionThis asynchronous web-based visit format was acceptable to colorectal surgeons but was only embraced by half of patients, despite considerable time savings. While patients preferred in-person visits, there may be opportunities to expand TeleHealth acceptance that focus on patient selection and education. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT05084131.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsTelemedicineCohort StudiesHumansPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsColorectal surgeryOnline patient portalPatient satisfactionPost-operativeSurgeon satisfactionTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID35713720
PMCPMC9205288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.