Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35713694›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Effects of transdermal versus oral hormone replacement therapy in postmenopause: a systematic review.

Marina Šprem Goldštajn, Mislav Mikuš, Filippo Alberto Ferrari, Mariachiara Bosco, Stefano Uccella, Marco Noventa, Peter Török, Sanja Terzic, Antonio Simone Laganà, Simone Garzon

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Brazilian Guideline on Menopausal Cardiovascular Health - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024
    Guideline
  4. Modern pharmacological management of Osteoporosis: from monotherapy to sequential and combination approaches in postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Design-ExpertPharmaceutics · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Trends in Government-Subsidised Menopausal Hormone Therapy Dispensing in Australia Between 2014 and 2023.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  12. Then and Now: What We Have Learned From the WHI.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Marina Šprem GoldštajnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Mislav MikušDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Filippo Alberto FerrariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. ferrarifilippoalberto@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0726-1687
Mariachiara BoscoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Stefano UccellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Marco NoventaDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Peter TörökFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Sanja TerzicDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Antonio Simone LaganàUnit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Simone GarzonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · ITUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRNazarbayev University · KZUniversity of Debrecen · HUUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo summarize available evidence comparing the transdermal and the oral administration routes of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of the literature on multiple databases between January 1990 and December 2021. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the transdermal and oral administration routes of estrogens for HRT in postmenopausal women regarding at least one of the outcomes of interest: cardiovascular risk, venous thromboembolism (VTE), lipid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, bone mineral density (BMD), and risk of pre-malignant and malignant endometrial lesions, or breast cancer.

resultsThe systematic literature search identified a total of 1369 manuscripts, of which 51 were included. Most studies were observational and of good quality, whereas the majority of randomized controlled trials presented a high or medium risk of bias. Oral and transdermal administration routes are similar regarding BMD, glucose metabolism, and lipid profile improvements, as well as do not appear different regarding breast cancer, endometrial disease, and cardiovascular risk. Identified literature provides clear evidence only for the VTE risk, which is higher with the oral administration route.

conclusionsAvailable evidence comparing the transdermal and oral administration routes for HRT is limited and of low quality, recommending further investigations. VTE risk can be considered the clearest and strongest clinical difference between the two administration routes, supporting the transdermal HRT as safer than the oral administration route.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsVenous ThromboembolismAdministration, CutaneousAdministration, OralEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogensFemaleHormone Replacement TherapyHumansLipidsPostmenopauseEstrogensLipidsAdministration routeCancerCardiovascular riskHormone replacement therapyMetabolismPostmenopausalVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID35713694
PMCPMC10147786
OpenAlexW4283032275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.