Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35713566›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2022

DeNovoCNN: a deep learning approach to de novo variant calling in next generation sequencing data.

Gelana Khazeeva, Karolis Sablauskas, Bart van der Sanden, Wouter Steyaert, Michael Kwint, Dmitrijs Rots, Max Hinne, Marcel van Gerven, Helger Yntema, Lisenka Vissers and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Automated Identification of GermlinebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Gelana KhazeevaDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Karolis SablauskasInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Bart van der SandenDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wouter SteyaertDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michael KwintDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dmitrijs RotsDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Max HinneDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marcel van GervenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Helger YntemaDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lisenka VissersDepartment of Human Genetics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Christian GilissenDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1693-9699
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

De novo mutations (DNMs) are an important cause of genetic disorders. The accurate identification of DNMs from sequencing data is therefore fundamental to rare disease research and diagnostics. Unfortunately, identifying reliable DNMs remains a major challenge due to sequence errors, uneven coverage, and mapping artifacts. Here, we developed a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) DNM caller (DeNovoCNN), that encodes the alignment of sequence reads for a trio as 160$ \times$164 resolution images. DeNovoCNN was trained on DNMs of 5616 whole exome sequencing (WES) trios achieving total 96.74% recall and 96.55% precision on the test dataset. We find that DeNovoCNN has increased recall/sensitivity and precision compared to existing DNM calling approaches (GATK, DeNovoGear, DeepTrio, Samtools) based on the Genome in a Bottle reference dataset and independent WES and WGS trios. Validations of DNMs based on Sanger and PacBio HiFi sequencing confirm that DeNovoCNN outperforms existing methods. Most importantly, our results suggest that DeNovoCNN is likely robust against different exome sequencing and analyses approaches, thereby allowing the application on other datasets. DeNovoCNN is freely available as a Docker container and can be run on existing alignment (BAM/CRAM) and variant calling (VCF) files from WES and WGS without a need for variant recalling.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingExome SequencingSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID35713566
PMCPMC9508836
OpenAlexW4283068733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.