Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35713439›Full record

ArticleMedicine2022

External validation of Villalta score in high-middle income country patients with deep vein thrombosis.

Rafael Bernardes de Ávila, Giulianna Barreira Marcondes, Silfayner Victor Mathias Dias, Beatriz Périco da Silveira, Jorge Eduardo de Amorim, Henrique Jorge Guedes Neto, Luis Carlos Uta Nakano, Ronald Luiz Gomes Flumignan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Angioplasty or stenting for deep venous thrombosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rafael Bernardes de ÁvilaDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2049-8080
Giulianna Barreira MarcondesDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4521-1605
Silfayner Victor Mathias DiasEvidence-Based health graduation program, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9794-6446
Beatriz Périco da SilveiraDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2516-1524
Jorge Eduardo de AmorimDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7149-1597
Henrique Jorge Guedes NetoDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6477-1822
Luis Carlos Uta NakanoDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7996-3269
Ronald Luiz Gomes FlumignanDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6440-8011
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractPost-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a late complication that does not have a cure yet, with a prevalence estimated between 20 to 75%, associated with previous deep vein thrombosis event. Although the Villalta score (VS) is the gold-standard clinical tool for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of PTS, there are currently no VS intra-rater agreement established and no validation studies for VS' application into Brazilian Portuguese. We sought to translate and validate VS reliability systematically; and, secondarily, to compare the ultrasound findings with the severity of PTS.We systematically translated the original VS into Brazilian Portuguese (BP). Fifty participants who underwent two outpatient visits were evaluated using the translated VS. We assessed its intra-rater and inter-rater agreement and compared BP VS versus CEAP clinical component (CEAP C), and the clinical PTS severity versus the duplex ultrasound (DUS) findings. The study and its report followed the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies.The intra-rater evaluation of VS grades had a simple Kappa coefficient of 0.73, and the simple Kappa coefficient inter-rater for VS grades was 0.67. When VS was compared to CEAP C, it established a remarkably high correlation over 0.9. There was difference among VS values compared to DUS initial deep vein thrombosis territory, with femoropopliteal showing higher values than distal veins. Higher VS values were correlated to DUS venous recanalization and reflux.There was a substantial inter-rater and intra-rater agreement when the BP VS was applied; and when compared to CEAP C, VS showed a high correlation. When VS grading was compared to DUS characteristics, there were significant statistical and clinical correlation, with presence of reflux and recanalization showing higher VS values. This external VS validation also changes the clinical practice allowing the VS use in a different population and establishes the VS intra-rater agreement.

Indexed as

Postthrombotic SyndromeVenous ThrombosisHumansReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonography, Doppler, DuplexVeins

Identifiers

PMID35713439
PMCPMC9276430
OpenAlexW4283021028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.