ArticleMedicine2022
Traditional Chinese medicine injections with activating blood circulation, equivalent effect of anticoagulation or antiplatelet, for acute myocardial infarction: A protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Multiomic Analysis Reveals the Therapeutic Potential of Danhong Injection in Mitigating Radiation-Induced Heart Disease by Modulating Ferroptosis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Article
- A Pharmacological Review of Tanshinones, Naturally Occurring Monomers fromOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2023Review
- Preparation and performance of random- and oriented-fiber membranes with core-shell structuresFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn spite of a growing number in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in China, the mortality of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not decreased. Traditional Chinese medicine injections for Activating Blood Circulation (TCMi-ABC), equivalent effect of anticoagulation or antiplatelet, are widely used in China; however, the improvement of fatality towards AMI is unclear. Therefore, we intend to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCMi-ABC in treatment with AMI.
methodsBased on the "National Medical Products Administration of China," TCMi-ABC with AMI treatment indication will be selected, including Danhong injection, Sodium Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate injection, Danshen Chuanxiongqin injection, and Puerarin injection. Randomized controlled studies will be searched from as follows: PubMed, Embase, the CENTRAL in Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform. Two researchers will work independently on literature selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. The outcomes focus on the effects of TCMi-ABC on fatality of patients with AMI in hospitalization and in the long term, the incidence of malignant arrhythmia, left ventricular ejection fraction, and adverse events. RevMan 5.4.1 software was used for mate analysis.
resultsThis study will conduct a comprehensive literature search and provide a systematic synthesis of current published data to explore the efficacy and safety of TCMi-ABC for AMI.
conclusionThis study will provide high-quality evidence for treatment of AMI with TCMi-ABC in terms of efficacy and safety, which may help clinicians make a better complementary treatment schedule of patients with AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.