ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Multicenter Repeatability and Reproducibility of MR Fingerprinting in Phantoms and in Prostatic Tissue.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-scanner repeatability and reproducibility of qRF-MRF breath-held and free-breathing with pilot tone in the abdomen.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Serial TEuropean radiology · 2026Article
- Wide-field quantitative micro-elastography of freshly excised human prostate.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Assessing repeatability and confounding factors of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) for quantitative liver imaging.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Repeatability of quantitative MR fingerprinting for TEuropean radiology · 2025Article
- T1 and T2 measurements across multiple 0.55T MRI systems using open-source vendor-neutral sequences.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Emerging and anticipated innovations in prostate cancer MRI and their impact on patient care.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
- Phantoms for Quantitative Body MRI: a review and discussion of the phantom value.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Quantifying 3D MR fingerprinting (3D-MRF) reproducibility across subjects, sessions, and scanners automatically using MNI atlases.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Emerging Trends in Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Quantitative Biomedical Imaging Applications: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Improving motion robustness of 3D MR fingerprinting with a fat navigator.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Quantitative longitudinal mapping of radiation-treated prostate cancer using MR fingerprinting with radial acquisition and subspace reconstruction.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2023Article
- Multiparametric MRI: From Simultaneous Rapid Acquisition Methods and Analysis Techniques Using Scoring, Machine Learning, Radiomics, and Deep Learning to the Generation of Novel Metrics.Investigative radiology · 2023Review
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Potential Clinical Applications.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Multicenter Repeatability and Reproducibility of MR Fingerprinting in Phantoms and in Prostatic Tissue.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- MR fingerprinting of the prostate.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Review
- Targeted Biopsy Validation of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer Characterization With Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Diffusion Mapping.Investigative radiology · 2019Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Technical Overview and Initial Results.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate multicenter repeatability and reproducibility of T
methodsMRF experiments were performed on 5 different 3 Tesla MRI scanners at 3 different institutions: University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (Cleveland, OH), Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA) in the United States, and Diagnosticos da America (Rio de Janeiro, RJ) in Brazil. Raw MRF data were reconstructed using a Gadgetron-based MRF online reconstruction pipeline to yield quantitative T
resultsThe intrascanner variation of values measured using MRF was less than 2% for T
conclusionProstate MRF measurements of T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.