Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35713122›Full record

ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2022

Suicide exposure experience screener for use in therapeutic settings: A validation report.

Myfanwy Maple, Julie Cerel, Rebecca Sanford, Fiona Shand, Philip J Batterham, Navjot Bhullar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Psychological Distress Among Suicide Exposed and Subsequently Bereaved Carers.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Myfanwy MapleSchool of Health, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9398-4886
Julie CerelCollege of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4534-5526
Rebecca SanfordSchool of Social Work and Human Service, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5417-7966
Fiona ShandBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6765-228X
Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4547-6876
Navjot BhullarDiscipline of Psychology, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1616-6094
Australian National University · AUBlack Dog Institute · AUEdith Cowan University · AUThompson Rivers University · CAUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of New England · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA brief screener assessing experience of exposure to suicide for use in therapeutic settings is warranted. To examine the concurrent validity of such a screening tool, labeled as the Suicide Exposure Experience Screener (SEES), the associations of the two SEES items: (i) reported closeness with the person who died by suicide and (ii) perceived impact of suicide death with psychological distress are presented.

methodsFive separate datasets comprising surveys from Australia, Canada, and the United States (N

resultsOverall, closeness and impact were significantly correlated with measures of global distress across five different datasets, showing small to medium effect sizes. Closeness and impact were also intercorrelated demonstrating a large effect size across all surveys. This report used cross-sectional data and comprised varied sample sizes across different datasets that influenced statistical significance of obtained effects and did not tease apart the roles of cumulative exposure of suicide and prolonged bereavement in experiencing global distress.

conclusionThe SEES has clinical utility in determining psychological distress in bereaved individuals and is recommended for use in therapeutic settings.

Indexed as

BereavementSuicideSuicide PreventionCross-Sectional StudiesGriefHumansSurveys and Questionnairesbereavementclosenessimpactpsychological distressscale validationsuicide exposuretherapy

Identifiers

PMID35713122
PMCPMC9796633
OpenAlexW4283023878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.