Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35712892›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

Impact of fentanyl use on initiation and discontinuation of methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone among people with prescription-type opioid use disorder: secondary analysis of a Canadian treatment trial.

M Eugenia Socias, Evan Wood, Bernard Le Foll, Ron Lim, Jin Cheol Choi, Wing Yin Mok, Julie Bruneau, Jürgen Rehm, T Cameron Wild, Nikki Bozinoff and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Drd1-cre mouse line with nucleus accumbens gene dysregulation exhibits blunted fentanyl seeking.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

M Eugenia SociasBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2556-7049
Evan WoodBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bernard Le FollDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Sciences Building, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ron LimDepartment of Family Medicine and Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jin Cheol ChoiBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Wing Yin MokBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Julie BruneauResearch Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3484-6456
Jürgen RehmDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5665-0385
T Cameron WildSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9947-7428
Nikki BozinoffDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ahmed HassanDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Sciences Building, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0115-1858
Didier Jutras-AswadResearch Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-508X
OPTIMA Research Group within the Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CABritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CASechenov University · RUUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Mentoring the next generation of addiction clinician scientists while responding to the opioid epidemicR25DA037756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI FAIRBAIRN, NADIA · 2014 to 2023
$3.6M
CIHRNIDA NIH HHS R25 DA037756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsFentanyl is primarily responsible for the current phase of the overdose epidemic in North America. Despite the benefits of treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), there are limited data on the association between fentanyl, MOUD type and treatment engagement. The objectives of this analysis were to measure the impact of baseline fentanyl exposure on initiation and discontinuation of MOUD among individuals with prescription-type opioid use disorder (POUD). DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsSecondary analysis of a Canadian multi-site randomized pragmatic trial conducted between 2017 and 2020. Of the 269 randomized participants, 65.4% were male, 67.3% self-identified as white and 55.4% had a positive fentanyl urine drug test (UDT) at baseline. Fentanyl-exposed participants were more likely to be younger, to self-identify as non-white, to be unemployed or homeless and to be currently using stimulants than non-fentanyl-exposed participants.

interventionsFlexible take-home dosing buprenorphine/naloxone or supervised methadone models of care for 24 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were (1) MOUD initiation and (2) time to (a) assigned and (b) overall MOUD discontinuation. Independent variables were baseline fentanyl UDT (predictor) and assigned MOUD (effect modifier).

findingsOverall, 209 participants (77.7%) initiated MOUD. In unadjusted analyses, fentanyl exposure was associated with reduced likelihood of treatment initiation [odds ratio (OR) = 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.08-0.36] and shorter median times in assigned [20 versus 168 days, hazard ratio (HR) = 3.61, 95% CI = 2.52-5.17] and any MOUD (27 versus 168 days, HR = 3.32, 95% CI = 2.30-4.80). The negative effects were no longer statistically significant in adjusted models, and no interaction between fentanyl and MOUD was observed for any of the outcomes (all P > 0.05).

conclusionsBoth buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone may be appropriate treatment options for people with prescription-type opioid use disorder regardless of fentanyl exposure. Other characteristics of fentanyl-exposed individuals appear to be driving the association with poorer treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationCanadaFemaleFentanylHumansMaleMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentPrescriptionsAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationFentanylMethadoneBuprenorphineclinical trialfentanylmethadoneopioid use disorderprescription opioids

Identifiers

PMID35712892
PMCPMC9969999
OpenAlexW4283027639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.