Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35712627›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Appraising Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality in a Developing Country Categorized by Gestational Age Grouping and Implications for Targeted Interventions.

Olugbenga Ayodeji Mokuolu, Omotayo Oluwakemi Adesiyun, Olayinka Rasheed Ibrahim, Habibat Dirisu Suberu, Selimat Ibrahim, Surajudeen Oyeleke Bello, Moboni Mokikan, Temitope Olorunshola Obasa, Mohammed Baba Abdulkadir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Determinants of neonatal morbidity in Rajshahi Division of Bangladesh.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Olugbenga Ayodeji MokuoluNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Omotayo Oluwakemi AdesiyunNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Olayinka Rasheed IbrahimNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Habibat Dirisu SuberuNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Selimat IbrahimCentre for Malaria and Other Tropical Diseases Care, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Surajudeen Oyeleke BelloNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Moboni MokikanDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States.
Temitope Olorunshola ObasaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Mohammed Baba AbdulkadirNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the relatively higher neonatal morbidity and mortality in developing countries, there are limited data on the detailed analysis of the burden in Nigeria. With a database of over 14,000 admissions, this study presents a compelling picture of the current trends disaggregated by their gestational age groups. It provides unique opportunities for better-targeted interventions for further reducing newborn mortality in line with SDG 3, Target 3.2. Methods: This prospective observational study involved newborn babies admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Kwara State, Nigeria, between January 2007 and December 2018. The outcome was the neonatal mortality rates. The exposure variables included birth weight, gestational age (preterm versus term), and clinical diagnosis. Frequencies were generated on tables and charts, and the trends or associations were determined. Results: Of the 14,760 neonates admitted, 9,030 (61.2%) were term babies, 4,847 (32.8%) were preterm babies, and in 792 (5%) of the admissions, the gestational ages could not be determined. Males constituted a higher proportion with 55.9%, and the total number of deaths in the study period was 14.7%. The mortality ratio was highest among babies with a birth weight of less than 1,000 g (38.0%) and gestational age of less than 28 weeks (65.5%). The trend analysis showed that the mortality rate decreased from 17.8 to 13% over the 12 years, Conclusion: There was a marked improvement in neonatal mortality trends. However, severe perinatal asphyxia, sepsis, hyperbilirubinemia, and respiratory disorders were the leading conditions contributing to 75% of the morbidities and mortalities. Measures to further accelerate the reduction in neonatal morbidity and mortality are discussed.

Indexed as

low-middle-income countryneonatal mortalitypretermsustainable development goalsterm babies

Identifiers

PMID35712627
PMCPMC9196884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.