Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35712593›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Suresh Kumar, Karishma Seem, Santosh Kumar, K K Vinod, Viswanathan Chinnusamy, Trilochan Mohapatra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Dynamic DNAGenome research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suresh KumarDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Karishma SeemDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Santosh KumarDecode Genomics Private Limited, New Delhi, India.
K K VinodDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Viswanathan ChinnusamyDivision of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Trilochan MohapatraIndian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Indian Agricultural Research Institute · INIndian Council of Agricultural Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytosine methylation, epigenetic DNA modification, is well known to regulate gene expression. Among the epigenetic modifications, 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) has been one of the extensively studied epigenetic changes responsible for regulating gene expression in animals and plants. Though a dramatic change in 5-mC content is observed at the genome level, the variation in gene expression is generally less than that it is expected. Only less is understood about the significance of 5-mC in gene regulation under P-starvation stress in plants. Using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of a pair of rice [Pusa-44 and its near-isogenic line (NIL)-23 harboring

Indexed as

DNA methylationgene body methylationgene expressionphosphate starvationRdDM pathwayrice

Identifiers

PMID35712593
PMCPMC9195100
OpenAlexW4281755154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.