Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35712554›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

The Impact of Multiple Species Invasion on Soil and Plant Communities Increases With Invasive Species Co-occurrence.

Dušanka Vujanović, Gianalberto Losapio, Stanko Milić, Dubravka Milić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Response of the Invasive Alien PlantPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Impact of Alligator Weed (Scientifica · 2025
    Article
  11. DoesMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Global indicators of the environmental impacts of invasive alien species and their information adequacy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. A nature-positive future with biological invasions: theory, decision support and research needs.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dušanka VujanovićBioSense Institute, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Gianalberto LosapioInstitute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stanko MilićLaboratory for Soil and Agroecology, Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Dubravka MilićDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite increasing evidence indicating that invasive species are harming biodiversity, ecological systems and processes, impacts of multiple species invasion and their links with changes in plant and soil communities are inadequately documented and remain poorly understood. Addressing multiple invaders would help to ward against community-wide, synergistic effects, aiding in designing more effective control strategies. In this work, correlative relationships are examined for potential impacts of three co-occurring invasive plant species,

Indexed as

Acer negundoAmorpha fruticosaFraxinus pennsylvanicamultiple invasionsnative plantsriparian ecosystemssoil communities

Identifiers

PMID35712554
PMCPMC9194948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.