ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022
Synthesizing Molecular and Immune Characteristics to Move Beyond WHO Grade in Meningiomas: A Focused Review.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment of the H8T-MG Meningioma Cell Line and Integrated Transcriptomics Reveal a Metabolic-Immune Signature in Diploid Transitional WHO Grade 1 Tumours.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Cancer stem cells in meningiomas: novel insights and therapeutic implications.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
- Patient-Derived Meningioma Organoids: A Reliable Model for Studying Human Tumor Pathophysiology.Cancers · 2025Article
- Stem-like signatures in human meningioma cells are under the control of CXCL11/CXCL12 chemokine activity.Neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- The Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Primary CNS Neoplasms: A Review of Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
No portion of this manuscript has previously been presented. Meningiomas, the most common primary intracranial tumors, are histologically categorized by the World Health Organization (WHO) grading system. While higher WHO grade is generally associated with poor clinical outcomes, a significant subset of grade I tumors recur or progress, indicating a need for more reliable models of meningioma behavior. Several groups have developed risk scores based on molecular or immunologic characteristics. These classification schemes show promise, with several models preliminarily demonstrating similar or superior accuracy to WHO grading. Improved understanding of immune system recognition and targeting of meningioma subtypes is necessary to advance the predictive power, as well as develop new therapies. Here, we characterize meningioma molecular drivers, predictive of recurrence and progression, and describe specific aspects of the immune response to meningiomas while highlighting critical questions and ongoing research. Relevant manuscripts of interest were identified using a systematic approach and synthesized into this focused review. Finally, we summarize the ongoing and completed clinical trials for immunotherapy in meningiomas and offer perspective on future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.