Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35712478›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

Efficacy and Safety Profile of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Changjun Wang, Yan Lin, Hanjiang Zhu, Yidong Zhou, Feng Mao, Xin Huang, Qiang Sun, Chenggang Li

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Epigenetic Regulation of Driver Genes in Testicular Tumorigenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Changjun WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan LinDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hanjiang ZhuDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Yidong ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Feng MaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin HuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiang SunDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chenggang LiState Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CNNankai University · CNUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Acquired resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) remains a big challenge in the management of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A novel therapeutic agent, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), targets the abnormal epigenetic modification and may overcome acquired resistance. However, HDACi efficacy and the safety profile for hormone receptor (HoR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative MBC remain controversial. Methods: Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for relevant studies on HDACi and HoR+/HER2- MBC. Demographic and clinicopathological parameters were extracted and presented as means and proportions, and between-group differences were assessed by Pearson chi-square test. Fixed- or random-effects models were used for meta-analysis based on inter-study heterogeneity. Pooled results were presented as L'Abbé plot and forest plot. Funnel plot and Egger's test were employed for evaluation of publication bias. Results: Four studies with 1,457 patients were included for meta-analysis. The overall objective response rates (ORRs) of HDACi + ET (HE) and placebo + ET (PE) groups were 11.52% and 6.67%, respectively. The HE regimen significantly increased ORR (odds ratio [OR] 1.633, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.103-2.418, Conclusions: This meta-analysis validated that the HE regimen had superior efficacy over control in terms of ORR, CBR, PFS, and OS, but was accompanied with increasing toxicity. HDACi plus ET could serve as an important option in managing HoR+/HER2- MBC. Future studies may focus on the clinical difference among different HDACi and AE managements to enhance tolerability.

Indexed as

endocrine therapyentinostathistone deacetylase inhibitorsmetastatic breast cancertucidinostat

Identifiers

PMID35712478
PMCPMC9192957
OpenAlexW4282006810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.