Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35712300›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Sex Disparity in Myopia Explained by Puberty Among Chinese Adolescents From 1995 to 2014: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.

Rongbin Xu, Panliang Zhong, Catherine Jan, Yi Song, Xiuqin Xiong, Dongmei Luo, Yanhui Dong, Jun Ma, Randall S Stafford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rongbin XuSchool of Public Health, Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Panliang ZhongSchool of Public Health, Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Catherine JanLost Child's Vision Project, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Yi SongSchool of Public Health, Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xiuqin XiongCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Dongmei LuoSchool of Public Health, Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yanhui DongSchool of Public Health, Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jun MaSchool of Public Health, Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Randall S StaffordDepartment of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Peking University · CNStanford University · USUniversity of Melbourne · AUVision Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Girls in East Asia have a higher myopia prevalence than boys. Less research has been done on whether girls' earlier puberty could explain this sex difference. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between myopia and puberty and the role of puberty in explaining the sex disparity in adolescent myopia prevalence. Design Setting and Participants: In this nationwide cross-sectional study, data came from five consecutive national surveys from 1995 to 2014 in China. We included 338,896 boys aged 11-18 and 439,481 girls aged 9-18. Main Outcomes and Measures: Myopia was defined according to unaided distance visual acuity and subjective refraction; puberty status was defined dichotomously as menarche or spermarche status. The association between myopia and puberty was evaluated by robust Poisson GEE regression. Mediation analyses were used to quantify how much of the sex disparity in myopia could be explained by puberty. Results: Post-menarche girls and post-spermarche boys showed 29-41% and 8-19% higher risk of myopia than pre-menarche girls and pre-spermarche boys, respectively. The association remained significant in girls [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.07, 95%CI:1.04-1.10] but disappeared in boys ( Conclusion and Relevance: Puberty status is independently associated with myopia in girls but not in boys. A significant proportion of the sex disparity in adolescent myopia could be explained by girls' earlier puberty, suggesting the need to consider sex-differentiated strategies for myopia prevention and treatment.

Indexed as

MyopiaSexual MaturationAdolescentChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePubertyadolescentsChinesemenarchemyopiapubertysex disparityspermarche

Identifiers

PMID35712300
PMCPMC9196902
OpenAlexW4281701744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.