Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35712230›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2022

Virtual Reality for Distraction and Relaxation in a Pediatric Hospital Setting: An Interventional Study With a Mixed-Methods Design.

Sylvie Bernaerts, Bert Bonroy, Jo Daems, Romy Sels, Dieter Struyf, Inge Gies, Wessel van de Veerdonk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bringing Virtual Reality to Mainstream Pediatric Care.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sylvie BernaertsExpertise Unit Psychology, Technology and Society, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bert BonroyMobilab & Care, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Geel, Belgium.
Jo DaemsMobilab & Care, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Geel, Belgium.
Romy SelsMobilab & Care, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Geel, Belgium.
Dieter StruyfCreative and Innovative Business, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Mechelen, Belgium.
Inge GiesDepartment of Pediatrics, Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
Wessel van de VeerdonkThomas More University of Applied Sciences, Mechelen, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence supports the use of virtual reality (VR) as an effective pain and anxiety management tool for pediatric patients during specific medical procedures in dedicated patient groups. However, VR is still not widely adopted in everyday clinical practice. Feasibility and acceptability measures of clinicians' experiences are often missing in studies, thereby omitting an important stakeholder in VR use in a clinical setting. Therefore, the aim of this mixed-methods study was to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, tolerability (primary outcomes), and preliminary effectiveness (secondary outcome) of Relaxation-VR in both pediatric patients aged 4-16 years and clinicians. Relaxation-VR is a VR application prototype aimed to provide distraction and relaxation for a variety of patient populations and procedures and is used to reduce anxiety, stress (tension) and pain for children in hospital. Multiple measures of acceptability, feasibility and tolerability, and pre-to-post changes in measures of pain, anxiety, stress and happiness were assessed in pediatric patients. At the end of the study, acceptability and feasibility of VR use was assessed in clinicians. Results indicate that VR use (in particular, the Relaxation-VR prototype) for both distraction and relaxation is acceptable, feasible and tolerable for a variety of pediatric patients aged 4-16 years, as assessed in both patients and clinicians, and can reduce anxiety, pain and tension (stress), and increase happiness in a hospital setting.

Indexed as

acceptabilityanxietyfeasibilityimplementationpediatricsrelaxationstressvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35712230
PMCPMC9192964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.