Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35712119›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Comparison of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Agents With Laser Photocoagulation for Retinopathy of Prematurity of 1,627 Eyes in China.

Dandan Linghu, Yong Cheng, Xuemei Zhu, Xun Deng, Hong Yin, Yanrong Jiang, Mingwei Zhao, Xiaoxin Li, Jianhong Liang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A review on retinopathy of prematurity.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dandan LinghuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Yong ChengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Xuemei ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Xun DengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Hong YinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Yanrong JiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Mingwei ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiaoxin LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Jianhong LiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Peking University People's Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacies and treatment outcomes of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents and laser therapy in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods: A retrospective, non-randomized, comparative study of patients diagnosed with type 1 ROP or aggressive posterior ROP (A-ROP) treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents or laser therapy as primary treatment at the People's Hospital of Peking University. Results: A total of 1,627 eyes of 862 patients were included. In Conclusions: In contrast to laser therapy, anti-VEGF agents as primary treatments have potential advantages for eyes with zone I type 1 ROP and A-ROP. For eyes with zone II type 1 ROP, laser photocoagulation and anti-VEGF agents therapy showed similar efficacy; however, the rate of reactivation with laser therapy was significantly lower than that with anti-VEGF agents. Among the anti-VEGF agents, the reactivation rate was much lower in eyes treated with conbercept than in eyes treated with ranibizumab. Compared to anti-VEGF agents, laser treated eyes had greater trend to myopia.

Indexed as

anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)APROPlaserretinopathy of the prematuritytype 1 ROP

Identifiers

PMID35712119
PMCPMC9193577
OpenAlexW4281707177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.