Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35712037›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2022

Assessing nephrology competence in general paediatrics-A survey of general paediatricians, paediatric nephrologists, residents, and program directors.

Amrit Kirpalani, Charushree Prasad, Natasha A Jawa, Adelle R Atkinson, Mark Feldman, Justin M Jeffers, Damien G Noone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amrit KirpalaniDivision of Nephrology, Department of Paediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7567-9052
Charushree PrasadDivision of Nephrology, Department of Paediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Natasha A JawaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adelle R AtkinsonDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark FeldmanDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Justin M JeffersDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Damien G NooneDivision of Nephrology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify nephrology topics of lowest perceived competency and importance for general paediatricians. Methods: Surveys were distributed to general paediatricians, paediatric residents, paediatric residency program directors, and paediatric nephrologists. Perceived importance and competence were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: Mean perceived competency from general paediatricians across all nephrology domains was 3.0, 95%CI (2.9 to 3.1) and mean importance was 3.2, 95%CI (3.1 to 3.3). Domains scoring below the means for competence and importance, respectively were kidney stones (2.5, 95%CI [2.2 to 2.7]) and 2.6, 95%CI [2.3 to 2.8]), acute kidney injury (2.5, 95%CI [2.2 to 2.8] and 2.4, 95%CI [2.1 to 2.8]), chronic kidney disease (1.9, 95%CI [1.7 to 2.2] and 2.1, 95%CI [1.8 to 2.4]), tubular disorders (1.8, 95%CI [1.6 to 2.0] and 2.0, 95%CI [1.8 to 2.3]), and kidney transplant (1.6, 95%CI [1.4 to 1.8] and 1.7, 95%CI [1.4 to 1.9]). Residents, program directors, and paediatric nephrologists agreed that stones, chronic kidney disease, tubular disorders, and transplant were of lower importance. However, acute kidney injury was the domain with the largest discrepancy in perceived importance between residents (4.4, 95%CI [4.2 to 4.6]), nephrologists (4.2, 95%CI [3.8 to 4.6]), and program directors (4.2, 95%CI [3.7 to 4.7]) compared to general paediatricians ([2.4, 95%CI [2.1 to 2.8]; P<0.05). Conclusion: Paediatricians did not believe acute kidney injury was important to their practice, despite expert opinion and evidence of long-term consequences. Educational interventions must address deficits in crucial domains of renal health in paediatrics.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryContinuing medical educationMedical educationPaediatric nephrologyPostgraduate medical educationSurvey research

Identifiers

PMID35712037
PMCPMC9191918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.