Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35711917›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Dynamic Meta-data Network Sparse PCA for Cancer Subtype Biomarker Screening.

Rui Miao, Xin Dong, Xiao-Ying Liu, Sio-Long Lo, Xin-Yue Mei, Qi Dang, Jie Cai, Shao Li, Kuo Yang, Sheng-Li Xie and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rui MiaoInstitute of Systems Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, China.
Xin DongInstitute of Systems Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, China.
Xiao-Ying LiuComputer Engineering Technical College, Guangdong Polytechnic of Science and Technology, Zhuhai, China.
Sio-Long LoInstitute of Systems Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, China.
Xin-Yue MeiInstitute of Systems Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, China.
Qi DangInstitute of Systems Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, China.
Jie CaiInstitute of Systems Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, China.
Shao LiMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, TCM-X Center/Bioinformatics Division, BNRIST/Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Kuo YangMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, TCM-X Center/Bioinformatics Division, BNRIST/Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Sheng-Li XieGuangdong-HongKong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Smart Discrete Manufacturing, Guangzhou, China.
Yong LiangPeng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research shows that each type of cancer can be divided into multiple subtypes, which is one of the key reasons that make cancer difficult to cure. Under these circumstances, finding a new target gene of cancer subtypes has great significance on developing new anti-cancer drugs and personalized treatment. Due to the fact that gene expression data sets of cancer are usually high-dimensional and with high noise and have multiple potential subtypes' information, many sparse principal component analysis (sparse PCA) methods have been used to identify cancer subtype biomarkers and subtype clusters. However, the existing sparse PCA methods have not used the known cancer subtype information as prior knowledge, and their results are greatly affected by the quality of the samples. Therefore, we propose the Dynamic Metadata Edge-group Sparse PCA (DM-ESPCA) model, which combines the idea of meta-learning to solve the problem of sample quality and uses the known cancer subtype information as prior knowledge to capture some gene modules with better biological interpretations. The experiment results on the three biological data sets showed that the DM-ESPCA model can find potential target gene probes with richer biological information to the cancer subtypes. Moreover, the results of clustering and machine learning classification models based on the target genes screened by the DM-ESPCA model can be improved by up to 22-23% of accuracies compared with the existing sparse PCA methods. We also proved that the result of the DM-ESPCA model is better than those of the four classic supervised machine learning models in the task of classification of cancer subtypes.

Indexed as

biomarkersCancer subtypeDM-ESPCA modeldynamic networkmeta-datasparse PCA

Identifiers

PMID35711917
PMCPMC9197542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.