Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35711889›Full record

ArticleThe breast journal2022

Is There a Difference in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Local Recurrence between Autologous Tissue and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction?

Kyunghyun Min, Hyun Ho Han, Eun Key Kim, Sae Byul Lee, Jisun Kim, Il Yong Chung, Hee Jeong Kim, Beom Seok Ko, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The breast journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A review of different breast reconstruction methods.American journal of translational research · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyunghyun MinDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7807-0143
Hyun Ho HanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7072-9882
Eun Key KimDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Sae Byul LeeDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Jisun KimDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Il Yong ChungDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Hee Jeong KimDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Beom Seok KoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Jong Won LeeDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Byung Ho SonDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Sei Hyun AhnDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6705-7867
Jin Sup EomDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3229-2012
Ulsan College · KRHanyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breast reconstruction has become common after total mastectomy; however, certain types of breast reconstruction may be associated with delayed local recurrence or poor survival. Here, we investigated whether there are differences in the diagnosis and prognosis of local recurrence between autologous reconstruction and implant reconstruction. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing breast cancer surgery with autologous tissue or immediate implant reconstruction in a single center (January 2003-December 2017). Patient data including the period from cancer surgery to local recurrence diagnosis, tumor size at the time of recurrence, and survival time after cancer surgery and recurrence detection were analyzed. Results: There was a significant difference ( Conclusions: Statistical difference in the detection time was observed between autologous tissue and implant group. On the other hand, there is no difference in recurrence tumor size or survival time. A further study is necessary to identify the different detection time of local recurrence.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsMammaplastyFemaleHumansMastectomyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35711889
PMCPMC9187269
OpenAlexW4226334630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.