ArticleJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2022
A Retrospective Analysis of Respiratory Complications under General Anesthesia during EBUS-TBNA.
Article in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Operating Room? Cytology-Based Yield and Resource Utilization of Outpatient Versus Operating Room EBUS-TBNA Pathways.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Feasibility and outcomes of curative-intent surgery for clinically node-positive non-small cell lung cancer with interstitial lung disease.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Evaluation of high flow nasal cannulae during endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopy (EBUS) in high anaesthetic risk patients: a monocentric prospective study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Observational
- Transbronchial Mediastinal Cryobiopsy Diagnostic Yield and Perioperative Patient Management: A Single Tertiary Center Experience.Thoracic research and practice · 2025Article
- Prospective Randomized Comparison of Opioid-Based Versus Non-Opioid-Based Anaesthetic Protocols for Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Complications of linear endobronchial ultrasound guided biopsies: narrative review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2025Review
- Clinical application of endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy-a single center, large sample, real-world study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: EBUS-TBNA is an established technique for diagnostically sampling intrathoracic masses and lymph nodes. While the procedure is commonly conducted under general anesthesia (GA), little is known regarding the association between anesthetic management and perioperative respiratory complications. Here, we aim to evaluate this association among patients presenting for EBUS-TBNA. Methods: 586 patients receiving GA for EBUS-TBNA between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of perioperative respiratory complications and the secondary endpoint was procedure end to OR exit time (minutes). Respiratory complications were defined as episodes of severe (SpO Results: Among all patients, 79 (13.5%) had respiratory complications. Four patient characteristics were associated with respiratory complications: home oxygen use (OR 2.39; 95% CI 1.26-4.45; P = 0.007), pre-existing respiratory disease (OR 2.01; CI 1.21-3.29; P = 0.005), ASA class (P = 0.03), and albuterol administration intra-operatively (OR 2.22; CI 1.23-3.92; P = 0.007). No anesthetic factors were found to be statistically significant. Procedures with respiratory complications had a longer duration (mean time 88.7 min vs. 111.8 min; P = 0.00009), prolonged time to extubation (mean time 11.9 min vs. 14.2 min; P = 0.039), and stayed in the room longer after extubation (mean time 18.4 min vs. 23.1 min; P = 0.0016). When comparing types of GA, there were no significant differences between volatile anesthetics versus TIVA (12.7% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.54). Conclusions: Pre-existing patient characteristics, as opposed to anesthetic factors, are associated with respiratory complications during EBUS-TBNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.