Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35711804›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Validation of a Liquid Biopsy Protocol for Canine BRAFV595E Variant Detection in Dog Urine and Its Evaluation as a Diagnostic Test Complementary to Cytology.

Fabio Gentilini, Christopher J Palgrave, Michal Neta, Raimondo Tornago, Tommaso Furlanello, Jennifer S McKay, Federico Sacchini, Maria E Turba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. BRAFVeterinary research communications · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Expression of MutatedVeterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabio GentiliniDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
Christopher J PalgraveIDEXX Laboratories Ltd., Wetherby, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Michal NetaIDEXX Laboratories Ltd., Wetherby, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Raimondo TornagoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
Tommaso FurlanelloVeterinary Clinic and Laboratory San Marco, Veggiano, Italy.
Jennifer S McKayIDEXX Laboratories Ltd., Wetherby, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Federico SacchiniIDEXX Laboratories Ltd., Wetherby, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Maria E TurbaGenefast srl, Forlì, Italy.
IDEXX Laboratories (France) · FRUniversity of Bologna · ITVeterinary Oncological Center · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant proportion of canine urothelial carcinomas carry the driver valine to glutamic acid variation (V595E) in BRAF kinase. The detection of V595E may prove suitable to guide molecularly targeted therapies and support non-invasive diagnosis of the urogenital system by means of a liquid biopsy approach using urine. Three cohorts and a control group were included in this multi-step validation study which included setting up a digital PCR assay. This was followed by investigation of preanalytical factors and two alternative PCR techniques on a liquid biopsy protocol. Finally, a blind study using urine as diagnostic sample has been carried out to verify its suitability as diagnostic test to complement cytology. The digital PCR (dPCR) assay proved consistently specific, sensitive, and linear. Using the dPCR assay, the prevalence of V595E in 22 urothelial carcinomas was 90.9%. When compared with histopathology as gold standard in the blind-label cases, the diagnostic accuracy of using the canine BRAF (cBRAF) variation as a surrogate assay against the histologic diagnosis was 85.7% with 92.3% positive predictive value and 80.0% negative predictive value. In all the cases, in which both biopsy tissue and the associated urine were assayed, the findings matched completely. Finally, when combined with urine sediment cytology examination in blind-label cases with clinical suspicion of malignancy, the dPCR assay significantly improved the overall diagnostic accuracy. A liquid biopsy approach on urine using the digital PCR may be a valuable breakthrough in the diagnostic of urothelial carcinomas in dogs.

Indexed as

BRAFhistopathologyliquid biopsyoncogenesprecision medicinesomatic mutation

Identifiers

PMID35711804
PMCPMC9195143
OpenAlexW4281801343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.