Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35711794›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Genome-Wide Association Studies, Runs of Homozygosity Analysis, and Copy Number Variation Detection to Identify Reproduction-Related Genes in Bama Xiang Pigs.

Jiayuan Mo, Yujie Lu, Siran Zhu, Lingli Feng, Wenjing Qi, Xingfa Chen, Bingkun Xie, Baojian Chen, Ganqiu Lan, Jing Liang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiayuan MoCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Yujie LuCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Siran ZhuCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Lingli FengCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Wenjing QiCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Xingfa ChenCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Bingkun XieCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Baojian ChenGuangxi Key Laboratory of Livestock Genetic Improvement, Guangxi Institute of Animal Science, Nanning, China.
Ganqiu LanCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Jing LiangCollege of Animal Science & Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Guangxi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Litter size and teat number are economically important traits in the porcine industry. However, the genetic mechanisms influencing these traits remain unknown. In this study, we analyzed the genetic basis of litter size and teat number in Bama Xiang pigs and evaluated the genomic inbreeding coefficients of this breed. We conducted a genome-wide association study to identify runs of homozygosity (ROH), and copy number variation (CNV) using the novel Illumina PorcineSNP50 BeadChip array in Bama Xiang pigs and annotated the related genes in significant single nucleotide polymorphisms and common copy number variation region (CCNVR). We calculated the ROH-based genomic inbreeding coefficients (

Indexed as

Bama Xiang pigcandidate genesCNVGWASlitter sizeROHteat number

Identifiers

PMID35711794
PMCPMC9195146
OpenAlexW4281617804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.