ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Prospective comparative analysis of efficacy of local debridement with or without vancomycin impregnated calcium sulphate in chronic osteomyelitis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single versus two-stage management of long-bone chronic osteomyelitis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of use of Vancomycin impregnated bioabsorbable calcium sulphate (VCS) pellets along with surgical debridement to control group without the use of calcium sulphate for chronic osteomyelitis. The secondary objective was comparing the results in different subtypes of chronic osteomyelitis. Methods: 50 consecutive patients were enrolled in VCS group and control group based on used whether VCS was used in treatment in addition to surgical debridement or not. Patients were classified using Cerny Mader Classification and were serially followed up to compare efficacy of eradication of infection and complications between the groups. Results: Patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months postoperatively (range, 24-63 months; mean 32.2 ± 4.2months). 88% (44/50) of patients in VCS group achieved eradication of infection when compared to 64% (32/50) in control group at 2-year follow-up period (p < 0.001). Three out of six patient with recurrence in VCS group and 11 out 18 patients in control group achieved eradication after second stage surgery using same protocol using VCS. Among 10 with persistent infection, 5 among these were those with diffuse osteomyelitis and 5 were those with medullary osteomyelitis. In VCS group, 18/50 patients had persistent serous drainage from the wound for up to 4 weeks which was self-limiting. Conclusion: Local debridement combined with antibiotic impregnated calcium sulphate as a single-stage treatment is effective in treating chronic localized osteomyelitis when compared to debridement alone. However, its use alone in diffuse osteomyelitis may be less effective.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.