ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022
Amino Acid-Based Formula vs. Extensively Hydrolyzed Formula in the Treatment of Feeding Intolerance in Preterm Infants: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05347706 (Amino Acid-based Formula Versus Extensively Hydrolyzed Formula in the Treatment of Feeding Intolerance in Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Amino Acid-based Formula Versus Extensively Hydrolyzed Formula in the Treatment of Feeding Intolerance in Preterm Infants: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of factors affecting postoperative feeding intolerance in neonates following intestinal surgery.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Evaluating the reflux suppression properties of Gaviscon Infant powder with different milk formulations using an in vitro model of the infant stomach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Feeding intolerance is a common problem in preterm infants, which is associated with an increased risk of infections, prolonged hospitalization, and increased economic costs. When human milk is not available, formula feeding is required. Amino acid-based formula and extensively hydrolyzed formula could be considered for use for severe feeding intolerance. A recent Cochrane meta-analysis found that preterm infants fed extensively hydrolyzed formula compared with standard formula could not reduce the risk of feeding intolerance and necrotizing enterocolitis, and weight gain was slower. Some studies reported that preterm infants fed amino acid-based formula could reduce the gastric residual volume. We hypothesize that amino acid-based formula can improve feeding intolerance and establish full enteral feeding more rapidly in preterm infants compared with extensively hydrolyzed formula. Method: The randomized, prospective, controlled trial was conducted at the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China). A total of 190 preterm infants with gestational age <32 weeks or birth weight <1,500 g and with a diagnosis of feeding intolerance were included. Patients were randomized to an amino acid-based formula-fed group and an extensively hydrolyzed formula-fed group. The primary outcome is the time (days) to reach full enteral feedings. Secondary outcomes include duration of vomiting and abdominal distension, gastric residual volume, body weight, length and head circumference during hospitalization, length of hospital stay (days), cost of hospitalization, time (days) of parenteral nutrition, change of abdomen circumference, main serum parameters, and incidence of adverse events. Discussion: The successful implementation of our study will provide robust evidence for formula alternatives in preterm infants with feeding intolerance. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05347706.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.