ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022
A Quick Analysis Method for Protein Quantification in Oilseed Crops: A Comparison With Standard Protocol.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparative Effects of Exogenous Organic Amendments on Rhizosphere Microbial Communities and Soil Properties in Continuous Cropping Watermelon.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Integrated multi-omics reveals the molecular basis of protein storage in developing oat grains.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Biologically Active Compounds of Plants of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Genomic-Wide Association Markers and Candidate Genes for the High-Protein Trait in Storage Roots of Cassava (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biochemical and agro-morphological traits-based mining for Malt Barley Germplasm.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Escalate protein plates from legumes for sustainable human nutrition.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein is one of the most abundant substances in plants and plays a major role in human health hence standardization of its analytical quantification method is essential. Various methods for protein quantification exist, such as Kjeldahl, Bradford, Lowry, bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA), Biuret, and total amino acid content methods. These methods are widely applied; however, the development of the rapid and efficient method is the need of the time hence the objective of this research was to analyze and comparing compare the modification of the Kjeldahl method for the determination of protein content in oilseed crops. The study was performed to improve the sample preparation method (processing and digestion) for protein quantification. Generally, the method initially requires homogenization of grains to a fine flour, which involves time and increases the risk of sample cross-contamination and partial loss of oil from the sample during grinding. Moreover at times, it becomes challenging to homogenize oil seeds to fine flour due to high oil content. However, in the present research, the whole grain was digested in place of grounded flour to accomplish quick protein quantification and compared it with the flour matrix of different oil seeds. To further reduce the digestion time and avoid frothing, we have used the modified digestion mixture. The developed method was statistically validated using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson correlation reliability test, paired
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.