ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
Identification and Validation of a Urinary Biomarker Panel to Accurately Diagnose and Predict Response to Therapy in Lupus Nephritis.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measurements of urinary biomarkers at 2 years following a lupus nephritis flare are associated with subsequent renal outcomes.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Global perspectives on lupus nephritis: a review of clinical trials and therapeutic innovations.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Serum uric acid in systemic lupus erythematosus with preserved renal function: a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Biomarkers in Lupus Nephritis: An Evidence-Based Comprehensive Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Portable Fluorescence Microarray Reader-Enabled Biomarker Panel Detection System for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Lupus Nephritis.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Exploring potential multiple molecular biomarkers that predict treatment response in patients with lupus nephritis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus: A scoping review.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Article
- Investigating the value of urinary biomarkers in relation to lupus nephritis histopathology: present insights and future prospects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Mapping theme evolution and identifying hotspots in biomarkers of systemic lupus erythematosus based on global research.Biomarkers in medicine · 2024Article
- Biomarkers Associated with Drugs for the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Platelets in Renal Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Lupus Nephritis Risk Factors and Biomarkers: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Fecal and Urinary Adipokines as Disease Biomarkers.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Editorial: New biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: We have previously shown that 15 urinary biomarkers (of 129 tested by Luminex), discriminate between active Lupus Nephritis (ALN) and non-LN patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of these 15 previously-identified urinary biomarkers to predict treatment responses to conventional therapy, and for the most predictive of these biomarkers to validate their utility to identify ALN patients in an independent prospectively-acquired lupus cohort. Methods: Our study had a 3-stage approach. In stage 1, we used Luminex to examine whether our previously identified urinary biomarkers at the time of the renal flare ( ± 3 months) or 12 ± 3 months after treatment of biopsy-proven ALN could predict treatment responses. In stage 2, a larger prospectively-acquired cross-sectional cohort was used to further validate the utility of the most predictive urinary biomarkers (identified in stage 1) to detect ALN patients. In this 2 Results: Twenty-one patients were included in stage 1. Twelve (57.1%), 4 (19.1%), and 5 (23.8%) patients had a complete (CR), partial (PR) and no (NR) remission at 24 ± 3 months, respectively. The percentage decrease following 12 ± 3 months of treatment for Adiponectin, MCP-1, sVCAM-1, PF4, IL-15 and vWF was significantly higher in patients with CR in comparison to those with PR/NR. In stage 2, a total of 247 SLE patients were included, of which 24 (9.7%) had ALN, 79 (31.9%) had LN in remission (RLN) and 144 (58.3%) were non-LN (NLN) patients. Based on the combinations of biomarkers with the best operating characteristics we propose "rule out" and "rule in" ALN criteria. In stage 3, 53 biopsy-proven ALN patients were included, 35 with proliferative LN and 18 with non-proliferative ALN, demonstrating that our "rule in ALN" criteria operate better in detecting active proliferative than non-proliferative classes. Conclusions: Our results provide further evidence to support the role of Adiponectin, MCP-1, sVCAM-1 and PF4 in the detection of proliferative ALN cases. We further show the clinical utility of measuring multiple rather than a single biomarker and we propose novel "rule in" and "rule out" criteria for the detection of proliferative ALN with excellent operating characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.