Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35711424›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Heterogeneous SARS-CoV-2-Neutralizing Activities After Infection and Vaccination.

Marianne Graninger, Jeremy V Camp, Stephan W Aberle, Marianna T Traugott, Wolfgang Hoepler, Elisabeth Puchhammer-Stöckl, Lukas Weseslindtner, Alexander Zoufaly, Judith H Aberle, Karin Stiasny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marianne GraningerCenter for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jeremy V CampCenter for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stephan W AberleCenter for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marianna T TraugottDepartment of Medicine IV, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang HoeplerDepartment of Medicine IV, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.
Elisabeth Puchhammer-StöcklCenter for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lukas WeseslindtnerCenter for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander ZoufalyDepartment of Medicine IV, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.
Judith H AberleCenter for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karin StiasnyCenter for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOCs) with different resistance levels to existing immunity have recently emerged. Antibodies that recognize the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein and exhibit neutralizing activities are considered the best correlate of protection and an understanding of humoral immunity is crucial for controlling the pandemic. We thus analyzed such antibodies in individuals recovered from infection in 2020 as well as vaccinees after two doses of an mRNA vaccine. Methods: Neutralizing antibody responses against three SARS-CoV-2 variants (D614G, VOCs Beta and Delta) were determined in serum samples from 54 infected individuals (24 non-hospitalized, 30 hospitalized) and 34 vaccinees shortly after symptom onset or second vaccination, respectively, as well as six months later. In addition, the effect of the S sequence of the infecting strain on neutralization was studied. Results: Non-hospitalized patients had the lowest neutralization titers against all variants, while those of hospitalized patients equaled or exceeded those of vaccinees. Neutralizing activity was lower against the two VOCs and declined significantly in all cohorts after six months. This decrease was more pronounced in hospitalized and vaccinated individuals than in non-hospitalized patients. Of note, the specific neutralizing activity (NT titer/ELISA value ratio) was higher in the infected cohorts than in vaccinees and did not differ between non-hospitalized and hospitalized patients. Patients infected with viral strains carrying mutations in the N-terminal domain of the spike protein were impaired in Beta VOC neutralization. Conclusions: Specific neutralizing activities were higher in infected than in vaccinated individuals, and no difference in the quality of these antibodies was observed between hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients, despite significantly lower titers in the latter group. Additionally, antibody responses of infected individuals showed greater heterogeneity than those of vaccinees, which was associated with mutations in the spike protein of the infecting strain. Overall, our findings yielded novel insights into SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies, evolving differently after virus infection and COVID-19 vaccination, which is an important issue to consider in ongoing vaccine strategy improvements.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsmRNA VaccinesNeutralization TestsSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccinationVaccines, SyntheticViral Envelope ProteinsAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesMembrane GlycoproteinsmRNA VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, SyntheticViral Envelope ProteinsCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodiesSARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responsesvariants of concern

Identifiers

PMID35711424
PMCPMC9196185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.