Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35711413›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2022

Differences in SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibody Responses After the First, Second, and Third Doses of BNT162b2 in Naïve and Previously Infected Individuals: A 1-Year Observational Study in Healthcare Professionals.

Manca Ogrič, Polona Žigon, Eva Podovšovnik, Katja Lakota, Snezna Sodin-Semrl, Žiga Rotar, Saša Čučnik

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Manca OgričDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Polona ŽigonDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Eva PodovšovnikValdoltra Orthopaedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia.
Katja LakotaDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Snezna Sodin-SemrlDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Žiga RotarDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Saša ČučnikDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity of Primorska · SIOrthopaedic Hospital Valdoltra · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Safe and effective vaccines against COVID-19 are critical for preventing the spread of SARS-CoV-2, but little is known about the humoral immune response more than 9 months after vaccination. We aimed to assess the humoral immune response after the first, second, and third (booster) doses of BNT162b2 vaccine in SARS-CoV-2 naïve and previously infected healthcare professionals (HCP) and the humoral immune response after infection in vaccinated HCP. Methods: We measured anti-spike (anti-S) and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies at different time points up to 12 months in the sera of 300 HCP who had received two or three doses of BNT162b2 vaccine. Mixed-model analyses were used to assess anti-S antibody dynamics and to determine their predictors (age, sex, BMI, and previous infection). Results: Naïve individuals had statistically lower anti-S antibody concentrations after the first dose (median 253 BAU/ml) than previously infected individuals (median 3648 BAU/ml). After the second dose, anti-S antibody concentrations increased in naïve individuals (median 3216 BAU/ml), whereas the second dose did not significantly increase concentrations in previously infected individuals (median 4503 BAU/ml). The third dose resulted in an additional increase in concentrations (median 4844 BAU/ml in naïve and median 5845 BAU/ml in previously infected individuals). Anti-S antibody concentrations steadily decreased after the second dose and after the third dose in naïve and previously infected individuals. In addition, we found that age had an effect on the humoral immune response. Younger individuals had higher anti-S antibody concentrations after the first and second doses. After infection with the new variant Omicron, a further increase in anti-S antibody concentrations to a median value of 4794 BAU/ml was observed in three times vaccinated HCP whose anti-S antibody concentrations were relatively high before infection (median 2141 BAU/ml). Our study also showed that individuals with systemic adverse events achieved higher anti-S antibody concentrations. Conclusion: In this study, significant differences in humoral immune responses to BNT162b2 vaccine were observed between naïve and previously infected individuals, with age playing an important role, suggesting that a modified vaccination schedule should be practiced in previously infected individuals. In addition, we showed that the high anti-S antibodies were not protective against new variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesDelivery of Health CareHumansSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesanti-S antibody dynamicsBNT162b2 vaccineCOVID-19healthcare professionalshumoral immune responseSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35711413
PMCPMC9196038
OpenAlexW4281643894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.