Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35711382›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Analysis From a Multicenter Registry.

Manuel Almendro-Delia, Emilia Blanco-Ponce, Jesús Carmona-Carmona, J A Arboleda Sánchez, Juan Carlos Rodríguez Yáñez, José Manuel Soto Blanco, Isabel Fernández García, José M Castillo Caballero, Juan C García-Rubira, Rafael J Hidalgo-Urbano

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02500290 unknown statusnot on this map

Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Safety and Efficacy of Switching Antiplatelet

TypeobservationalSponsorFundación Pública Andaluza Progreso y SaludRan2014 to 2021Enrolled2,000ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome
NCT04630288 unknown statusnot on this map

ANTIPLATELET TREATMENT IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES. SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ANTIPLATELET SWITCHING Safety and Efficacy of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

TypeobservationalSponsorAndalusian Initiative for Advanced Therapies - Fundación Pública Andaluza Progreso y SaludRan2019 to 2020Enrolled1,900ConditionsAcute Coronary SyndromesArmsClopidogrel, Ticagrelor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hyperacute stenting and angioplasty for acute extracranial non-tandem internal carotid artery strokes within the first 48 h: A 20-year experience and a systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Manuel Almendro-DeliaAcute Cardiovascular Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Emilia Blanco-PonceAcute Cardiovascular Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Jesús Carmona-CarmonaAcute Cardiovascular Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
J A Arboleda SánchezIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Juan Carlos Rodríguez YáñezIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain.
José Manuel Soto BlancoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital San Cecilio, Granada, Spain.
Isabel Fernández GarcíaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Costa del Sol, Malaga, Spain.
José M Castillo CaballeroIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain.
Juan C García-RubiraAcute Cardiovascular Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Rafael J Hidalgo-UrbanoAcute Cardiovascular Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria · ESHospital Costa del Sol · ESHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ESHospital Universitario Puerto Real · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The net clinical benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has recently been questioned by observational studies which did not account for time-dependent confounders. We aimed to assess the comparative safety and effectiveness of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel accounting for non-adherence in a real-life setting. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with ACS discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel between 2015 and 2019. Major exclusions were previous intracranial bleeding, and the use of prasugrel or oral anticoagulation. Association of P2Y Results: Among 2,070 patients (mean age 63 years, 27% women, 62.5% ST-elevation MI), 1,035 were discharged on ticagrelor and clopidogrel, respectively. Ticagrelor-treated patients were younger and had few comorbidities, but high rates of medication non-compliance, compared with clopidogrel users. After comprehensive multivariate adjustments, ticagrelor did not increase the risk of major bleeding compared with clopidogrel [subhazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.96-2.05], while proved superior in reducing MACE (hazard ratio 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.90), vascular death (subhazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.97) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (subhazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.79); thereby resulting in a favorable net clinical benefit (hazard ratio 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98) compared with clopidogrel. Results from sensitivity analyses were consistent with those from the primary analysis, whereas those from the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis went in the opposite direction. Conclusion: Among all-comers with ACS, ticagrelor did not significantly increase the risk of major bleeding, while resulting in a net clinical benefit compared with clopidogrel. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings in high bleeding risk populations. CREA-ARIAM Andalucía: (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02500290); Current pre-specified analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04630288).

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromedual antiplatelet therapyexposure misclassificationmedication adherenceP2Y 12 inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID35711382
PMCPMC9197128
OpenAlexW4281761516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.