Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35711254›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Microscopic Transsphenoidal Resection of Giant Pituitary Adenomas: Analysis of the Factors Limiting the Degree of Resection in 73 Cases.

Zhijie Pei, Jiaxing Wang, Shuwen Mu, Tianshun Feng, Meina Wang, Shentong Yu, Liangfeng Wei, Yi Fang, Shousen Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Endoscopic and exoscopic surgery for brain tumors.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhijie PeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Jiaxing WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Yichang, The People's Hospital of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.
Shuwen MuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Tianshun FengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oriental Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Fuzhou, China.
Meina WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Shentong YuDepartment of Pathology, The 900th Hospital, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Liangfeng WeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The 900th Hospital, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yi FangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The 900th Hospital, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Shousen WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The 900th Hospital, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Medical University · CNXiamen University · CNYichang Central People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the risk factors affecting the gross-total resection of giant pituitary adenomas using a transsphenoidal approach under a microscope to provide a reference basis for formulating an appropriate surgical strategy. Methods: The clinical data of patients who underwent microscopic transsphenoidal resection of giant pituitary adenomas in a single center from January 2011 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on magnetic resonance imaging and surgical records, the predictive factors affecting the gross-total resection of giant pituitary adenomas under microscopy were determined through univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 73 patients with giant pituitary adenomas underwent transsphenoidal microsurgery. Gross-total resection was performed in 19 cases (26%), subtotal resection in 31 cases (42%), partial resection in 21 cases (29%), and the degree of resection was <50% in only two cases (3%). After binary logistic analysis, it was found that it was more difficult to completely remove giant pituitary adenomas with a Knosp grade 3-4 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.214, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.917; Conclusion: It is difficult to remove a giant pituitary adenoma invading the cavernous sinus completely with a higher degree of invasion of the suprasellar region using microscopic transsphenoidal surgery. The combined application of multiple surgical methods can help to improve the degree of resection during a single operation.

Indexed as

cavernous sinus invasiongiant pituitary adenomagross-total resectionmicroscopic transsphenoidal surgerypituitary surgery

Identifiers

PMID35711254
PMCPMC9195514
OpenAlexW4281692640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.