ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Microscopic Transsphenoidal Resection of Giant Pituitary Adenomas: Analysis of the Factors Limiting the Degree of Resection in 73 Cases.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- LAT1-mediated amino acid metabolism reprogramming: a novel metabolic vulnerability in recurrent pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- Pituitary adenomas associated with hydrocephalus: clinical characteristics, risk stratification, and clinical management.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Microscopic and Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Tumor Resection.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2025Article
- Endoscopic and exoscopic surgery for brain tumors.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the risk factors affecting the gross-total resection of giant pituitary adenomas using a transsphenoidal approach under a microscope to provide a reference basis for formulating an appropriate surgical strategy. Methods: The clinical data of patients who underwent microscopic transsphenoidal resection of giant pituitary adenomas in a single center from January 2011 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on magnetic resonance imaging and surgical records, the predictive factors affecting the gross-total resection of giant pituitary adenomas under microscopy were determined through univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 73 patients with giant pituitary adenomas underwent transsphenoidal microsurgery. Gross-total resection was performed in 19 cases (26%), subtotal resection in 31 cases (42%), partial resection in 21 cases (29%), and the degree of resection was <50% in only two cases (3%). After binary logistic analysis, it was found that it was more difficult to completely remove giant pituitary adenomas with a Knosp grade 3-4 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.214, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.917; Conclusion: It is difficult to remove a giant pituitary adenoma invading the cavernous sinus completely with a higher degree of invasion of the suprasellar region using microscopic transsphenoidal surgery. The combined application of multiple surgical methods can help to improve the degree of resection during a single operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.