Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35711173›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2022

Characteristics of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treated with Long-Acting Bronchodilators in a Real-World Setting in Singapore: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Marcus Sim, Anthony Yii, Xiaomeng Xu, Priti Bahety, Chee Hong Loh, Aldo Amador Navarro Rojas, Dominique Milea, Augustine Tee

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcus SimDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-3873
Anthony YiiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0884-2507
Xiaomeng XuValue Evidence & Outcomes, Greater China and Intercontinental, GSK, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-3936-0591
Priti BahetyMedical Affairs, GSK, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9793-5288
Chee Hong LohDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2232-2057
Aldo Amador Navarro RojasRespiratory & Specialty Medical Lead, Greater China and Intercontinental, GSK, Singapore, Singapore.
Dominique MileaValue Evidence & Outcomes, Greater China and Intercontinental, GSK, Singapore, Singapore.
Augustine TeeDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4798-871X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is limited real-world evidence regarding clinical practice for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Singapore. We compared baseline clinical characteristics and evaluated outcomes in patients with COPD who initiated treatment with either a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) or a LAMA and a long-acting β Methods: This was a single-center observational study at Changi General Hospital, Singapore. Routine clinical data (hospital visits, case management, lung function, laboratory/imaging results, medication orders) were collected and compiled into a data warehouse. Eligible patients with COPD were ≥40 years old and newly prescribed LAMA or LAMA+LABA during the enrollment period. Patient characteristics in the baseline period (6 months) were compared between treatments. Clinical worsening was measured as a composite endpoint, defined as the first of a change in maintenance treatment class or a moderate-to-severe exacerbation during follow-up (12 months). Results: In total, 261 patients were included in the baseline period (LAMA: 73; LAMA+LABA: 188). In the baseline period, patients receiving LAMA+LABA versus LAMA had significantly lower body mass index, higher COPD Assessment Test score and worse lung function, and numerically higher exacerbation history. Prevalence of comorbidities was similar between treatment groups. In follow-up, high rates of clinical worsening were observed regardless of treatment regimen (LAMA: 38/73 [52%]; LAMA+LABA: 86/188 [46%]). Median time-to-clinical worsening was 340 days for the LAMA cohort and the raw median 154 days (interquartile range: 44-225) for the LAMA+LABA cohort. Median medication dispensation rate (0.86; interquartile range: 0.56-1.00) was similar between treatments. Conclusion: Patients initiating treatment with LAMA+LABA had more severe COPD than patients prescribed LAMA. The proportion of patients experiencing clinical worsening was similarly high in both cohorts, suggesting that early identification and treatment optimization are necessary.

Indexed as

Bronchodilator AgentsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAdultDisease ProgressionDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMuscarinic AntagonistsSingaporeAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsMuscarinic AntagonistsCOPD treatmentdatabase analysisdual bronchodilatorinhaler prescriptionLABALAMA

Identifiers

PMID35711173
PMCPMC9192350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.