Trial reportActa neurologica Scandinavica2022
Onset of efficacy and adverse events during Cenobamate titration period.
Trial report in Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cenobamate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Onset of efficacy and adverse events during Cenobamate titration period.Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2022Trial
- Exploring the Role of Early Add-On Cenobamate in Uncontrolled Focal Epilepsy: A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Monitoring Antiseizure Medication Change Using Ultra Long-Term Electroencephalogram: A Multicenter Study.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Cenobamate: An Appraisal Five Years On.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Effect of Concomitant Medications on Adverse Event Frequency, Severity, and Time to Resolution in a Cenobamate Open-Label Trial.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Cenobamate in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: real-world evidence from a two-center retrospective study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Epilepsy: Molecular Pathogenesis and Emerging Therapies.MedComm · 2026Review
- Long-term Impact of Cenobamate on Cognition in Patients with Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: Outcomes from an Exploratory Real-World Study.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- A french real-world experience with cenobamate in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy: A retrospective observational study.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2025Article
- Cenobamate: A Review in Focal-Onset Seizures.CNS drugs · 2025Review
- Article
- Efficacy of add-on Cenobamate treatment in refractory epilepsy due to Rasmussen's encephalitis.Epilepsia open · 2024Article
- Observational
- Spanish consensus on the management of concomitant antiseizure medications when using cenobamate in adults with drug-resistant focal seizures.Epilepsia open · 2024Article
- Review
- Cenobamate (YKP3089) and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesCenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) approved in Europe as adjunctive therapy for adults with inadequately controlled focal seizures. This post hoc analysis reports onset of efficacy and characterizes time to onset, duration, and severity of the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during cenobamate titration. MATERIALS &
methodsAdult patients with uncontrolled focal seizures taking 1 to 3 concomitant ASMs were randomized to receive adjunctive cenobamate or placebo (double-blind studies C013 and C017) or cenobamate (open-label study C021). Outcome assessments included efficacy (median percentage change in seizure frequency and onset [studies C013 and C017]) and safety (onset, duration, and severity of TEAEs [all studies]).
resultsOnset of efficacy was observed by Weeks 1 to 4 of titration in studies C013 and C017 which used a faster titration schedule than study CO21. In study C013, the median percentage seizure frequency reduction was 36.7% in patients receiving cenobamate versus 16.3% in those taking placebo (p = .002); in study C017, significant differences in seizure frequency emerged in Week 1 and continued throughout titration between all cenobamate groups and placebo (p < .001). The most commonly reported TEAEs were somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, and headache, with first onset of each reported as early as Week 1; however, the majority resolved.
conclusionsReductions in seizure frequency occurred during titration with initial efficacy observed prior to reaching the target dose. These reductions were regarded as clinically meaningful because they may indicate early efficacy at lower doses than previously expected and had a considerable impact on patient quality of life. Long-term treatment with adjunctive cenobamate was generally safe and well-tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.