Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35711072›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022

Automatic Brain Tumor Classification via Lion Plus Dragonfly Algorithm.

B Leena, A N Jayanthi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B LeenaKGiSL Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, India. leenab643@gmail.com.
A N JayanthiSri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, India.
KG Hospital · INSri Ramakrishna Institute of Paramedical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denoising, skull stripping, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification are five important processes in this paper's development of a brain tumor classification model. The brain tumor image will be imposed first using the entropy-based trilateral filter to de-noising and this image is imposed to skull stripping by means of morphological partition and Otsu thresholding. Adaptive contrast limited fuzzy adaptive histogram equalization (CLFAHE) is also used in the segmentation process. The gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) characteristics are derived from the segmented image. The collected GLCM features are used in a hybrid classifier that combines the neural network (NN) and deep belief network (DBN) ideas. As an innovation, the hidden neurons of the two classifiers are modified ideally to improve the prediction model's accuracy. The hidden neurons are optimized using a unique hybrid optimization technique known as lion with dragonfly separation update (L-DSU), which integrates the approaches from both DA and LA. Finally, the suggested model's performance is compared to that of the standard models concerning certain performance measures.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsAlgorithmsFuzzy LogicImage Processing, Computer-AssistedBrain tumorCLAFAHEDBN and NNGLCML-DSUOtsu thresholding and morphological segmentation

Identifiers

PMID35711072
PMCPMC9582188
OpenAlexW4283017304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.