Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710956›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2022

A standard protocol for the analysis of postmortem muscle protein degradation: process optimization and considerations for the application in forensic PMI estimation.

Stefan Pittner, Veronika Merold, Sven Anders, Larissa Lohner, Jens Amendt, Miriam Klinger, Roland Hausmann, Steffen Kissling, Fabio Monticelli, Janine Geissenberger and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. "Omics" and Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. DNA forensics at forty: the way forward.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stefan PittnerDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. stefan.pittner@plus.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9862-9135
Veronika MeroldDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Sven AndersDepartment of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Larissa LohnerDepartment of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jens AmendtInstitute of Legal Medicine, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Miriam KlingerInstitute of Legal Medicine, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Roland HausmannInstitute of Legal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St, Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Steffen KisslingInstitute of Legal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St, Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Fabio MonticelliDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Janine GeissenbergerDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Angela ZisslerDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Peter SteinbacherDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 31490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of postmortem protein degradation has become of large interest for the estimation of the postmortem interval (PMI). Although several techniques have been published in recent years, protein degradation-based techniques still largely did not exceed basic research stages. Reasons include impractical and complex sampling procedures, as well as highly variable protocols in the literature, making it difficult to compare results. Following a three-step procedure, this study aimed to establish an easily replicable standardized procedure for sampling and processing, and further investigated the reliability and limitations for routine application. Initially, sampling and processing were optimized using a rat animal model. In a second step, the possible influences of sample handling and storage on postmortem protein degradation dynamics were assessed on a specifically developed human extracorporeal degradation model. Finally, the practical application was simulated by the collection of tissue in three European forensic institutes and an international transfer to our forensic laboratory, where the samples were processed and analyzed according to the established protocol.

Indexed as

Muscle ProteinsPostmortem ChangesAnimalsForensic PathologyHumansMuscle, SkeletalProteolysisRatsReproducibility of ResultsMuscle ProteinsDegradationMusclePMIProteinProtocol

Identifiers

PMID35710956
PMCPMC9576658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.