Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35710951›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

Combined artificial intelligence and radiologist model for predicting rectal cancer treatment response from magnetic resonance imaging: an external validation study.

Natally Horvat, Harini Veeraraghavan, Caio S R Nahas, David D B Bates, Felipe R Ferreira, Junting Zheng, Marinela Capanu, James L Fuqua, Maria Clara Fernandes, Ramon E Sosa and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Based on Medicine, The Now and Future of Large Language Models.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Radiomics in colorectal cancer patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Natally Horvat *Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Harini Veeraraghavan *Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Caio S R NahasDepartment of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
David D B BatesDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Felipe R FerreiraDepartment of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Junting ZhengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Marinela CapanuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
James L FuquaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Maria Clara FernandesDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Ramon E SosaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Vetri Sudar JayaprakasamDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Giovanni G CerriDepartment of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Sergio C NahasDepartment of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Iva PetkovskaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA. petkovsi@mskcc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4373-6494

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate an MRI-based radiomic texture classifier alone and combined with radiologist qualitative assessment in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) using restaging MRI with internal training and external validation.

methodsConsecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by total mesorectal excision from March 2012 to February 2016 (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/internal dataset, n = 114, 41% female, median age = 55) and July 2014 to October 2015 (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo/external dataset, n = 50, 52% female, median age = 64.5) were retrospectively included. Two radiologists (R1, senior; R2, junior) independently evaluated restaging MRI, classifying patients (radiological complete response vs radiological partial response). Model A (n = 33 texture features), model B (n = 91 features including texture, shape, and edge features), and two combination models (model A + B + R1, model A + B + R2) were constructed. Pathology served as the reference standard for neoadjuvant treatment response. Comparison of the classifiers' AUCs on the external set was done using DeLong's test.

resultsModels A and B had similar discriminative ability (P = 0.3; Model B AUC = 83%, 95% CI 70%-97%). Combined models increased inter-reader agreement compared with radiologist-only interpretation (κ = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.89 vs k = 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.61). The combined model slightly increased junior radiologist specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values (93% vs 90%, 57% vs 50%, and 91% vs 90%, respectively).

conclusionWe developed and externally validated a combined model using radiomics and radiologist qualitative assessment, which improved inter-reader agreement and slightly increased the diagnostic performance of the junior radiologist in predicting pCR after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with LARC.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRectal NeoplasmsBrazilChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMiddle AgedRadiologistsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArtificial intelligenceMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyRectal cancerWatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID35710951
PMCPMC10150388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.