ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022
Combined artificial intelligence and radiologist model for predicting rectal cancer treatment response from magnetic resonance imaging: an external validation study.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence-based prediction of tumor response in digestive system neoplasm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- MRI radiomics prediction modelling for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- MRI-based radiomics for predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence with magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Radiomic Analysis of MRI for Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.Molecular imagingPooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Prognostic Modelling and Adaptive Treatment Monitoring in Radiation Oncology.Cureus · 2026Review
- Use of artificial intelligence in analysis of endoscopic images to detect residual disease or regrowth in rectal patients with complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and computational prediction models for risk stratification, treatment response, and outcomes in colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Foundation models for radiology-the position of the AI for Health Imaging (AI4HI) network.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- A novel structural modeling magnitude and orientation radiomic descriptor for evaluating response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancers via MRI.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Can Radiomics Predict Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic-Accuracy Studies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Medical Misinformation in AI-Assisted Self-Diagnosis: Development of a Method (EvalPrompt) for Analyzing Large Language Models.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Based on Medicine, The Now and Future of Large Language Models.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2024Review
- Application of Photoactive Compounds in Cancer Theranostics: Review on Recent Trends from Photoactive Chemistry to Artificial Intelligence.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Radiomics Beyond the Hype: A Critical Evaluation Toward Oncologic Clinical Use.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
- MRI-based radiomic score increased mrTRG accuracy in predicting rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Radiomics in colorectal cancer patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate an MRI-based radiomic texture classifier alone and combined with radiologist qualitative assessment in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) using restaging MRI with internal training and external validation.
methodsConsecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by total mesorectal excision from March 2012 to February 2016 (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/internal dataset, n = 114, 41% female, median age = 55) and July 2014 to October 2015 (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo/external dataset, n = 50, 52% female, median age = 64.5) were retrospectively included. Two radiologists (R1, senior; R2, junior) independently evaluated restaging MRI, classifying patients (radiological complete response vs radiological partial response). Model A (n = 33 texture features), model B (n = 91 features including texture, shape, and edge features), and two combination models (model A + B + R1, model A + B + R2) were constructed. Pathology served as the reference standard for neoadjuvant treatment response. Comparison of the classifiers' AUCs on the external set was done using DeLong's test.
resultsModels A and B had similar discriminative ability (P = 0.3; Model B AUC = 83%, 95% CI 70%-97%). Combined models increased inter-reader agreement compared with radiologist-only interpretation (κ = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.89 vs k = 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.61). The combined model slightly increased junior radiologist specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values (93% vs 90%, 57% vs 50%, and 91% vs 90%, respectively).
conclusionWe developed and externally validated a combined model using radiomics and radiologist qualitative assessment, which improved inter-reader agreement and slightly increased the diagnostic performance of the junior radiologist in predicting pCR after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with LARC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.